Peer-Review Process

The peer-review process at Legal Studies in Digital Age is designed to ensure the highest quality and academic rigor in all published articles. The journal follows a double-blind, anonymous peer-review process, in which both the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. This method helps maintain objectivity and impartiality, and ensures that the evaluation process is fair and based solely on the academic merit of the work.

Each submitted article is reviewed by two or three expert reviewers who are specialists in the relevant field of law and technology. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and experience, ensuring that they can provide detailed and constructive feedback. The reviewers assess the manuscript on the basis of originality, significance, clarity, methodology, and relevance to the scope of the journal.

Once the peer review is complete, the editors make the final decision on whether to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript. If revisions are needed, authors will be provided with detailed feedback and have the opportunity to address reviewer comments before resubmitting the article.

This rigorous peer-review process ensures that Legal Studies in Digital Age maintains a high standard of scholarly quality and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the fields of law and technology.