The Principle of Disclosure in the Contractual Process: A Comparative Study of European and Iranian Legal Instruments
Keywords:
Principle of Disclosure, Principle of Transparency, European Law, Iranian Law, Contractual ProcessAbstract
The aim of this study is to elucidate the principle of disclosure in the contractual process through a comparative analysis of European and Iranian legal instruments. The present research is conducted using a descriptive-analytical approach. Data collection has been carried out through library-based research by referring to documents, books, and academic articles. In the formation of major contracts, a preliminary phase occurs between the two parties, commonly referred to as the "pre-contractual period." This stage is predominantly characterized by preliminary discussions and negotiations between the parties concerning the content and terms of the future contract. During this process, the parties become aware of each other’s positions and align their perspectives in order to reach an agreement that forms the foundation of the contract. Entry into the pre-contractual period does not in itself entail an obligation to conclude a contract; however, it is governed by specific principles and regulations, the violation of which may lead to pre-contractual liability or influence the legal status of the future agreement. One of the main purposes of pre-contractual relations is the exchange of information, which enables the necessary evaluations and facilitates informed decisions regarding whether to proceed with or withdraw from the transaction. Although in significant contracts the parties typically enter negotiations after conducting prior studies and acquiring preliminary information, not all issues of interest are fully clarified. Consequently, further consultation with the other party is often required to resolve outstanding questions. Moreover, certain issues may emerge in direct interaction with the other party that were not previously foreseeable and can only be decided upon after receiving adequate information. One of the challenges faced by legal systems is the duty of disclosure during the pre-contractual period. In other words, the question arises whether the parties are obligated to disclose relevant information to one another prior to entering into a contract and whether they must inform each other of facts related to the future agreement. Alternatively, is such disclosure merely encouraged in economic relations, or is it unreasonable to expect disclosure from the other party, thus placing the burden on each party to protect their own interests and to decide on contract formation with due diligence?
References
Abedian, M. H., & Kharoushi, A. (2009). Pre-Contractual Obligations of Insurers and Their Absence in the Commercial Insurance Bill. Legal Research Journal(50).
Alvardi, H. (2020). The Obligation to Provide Information in Electronic Transactions (Comparative Study Between Iraqi and Iranian Law). Tehran: Al-Mustafa International University].
Amiri Qaem Maqami, A. (1999). Law of Obligations (Legal Acts - Formation of Contracts), Vol. 2. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
Barikloo, A., & Khazaei, S. A. (2011). The Principle of Good Faith and Its Consequences in the Pre-Contractual Period: A Comparative Study in English and French Law. Judiciary Legal Journal(11).
Barnett, K., & Harder, S. (2014). Remedies in Australian Contract Law. New York. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107445260
Beatson, J., Burrows, A. S., & Cartwright, J. (2016). Anson's Law of Contract. Londons. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198734789.001.0001
Bix, B. H. (2012). Contract Law: Rules, Theory and Context. New York. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139024877
Chen-Wishart, M., & Magnus, U. (2014). Termination, Price Reduction and Damages, in The Common European Sales Law in Context: Interactions with English and German Law. UK. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678907.003.0019
Gandomkar, R. H. (2017). Comparative Study of Remedies for Breach of Obligations (Study in Iranian Law, Common Law, and Romano-Germanic Systems). Comparative Studies of Islamic and Western Law, 4(4), 141-166.
Ghahari, H. (2018). The Principle of Transparency in Contract Law. Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Culture].
Ghasemi Hamed, A. (2007). Good Faith in Contracts: Basis for the Obligation to Honesty and Cooperation in French Law. Legal Research Quarterly, 10(46).
Ghasemi Hamed, A., & Taleb Ahmadi, H. (2011). Pre-Contractual Information Disclosure. Legal Studies Journal, 3(1).
Joneidi, L. (2002). Comparative Study of the Obligation to Provide Information with Emphasis on Common Law Systems. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science(51).
Jourdan, P. (2007). Analysis of Judicial Practices in Civil LiabilityPB - Translated and researched by Majid Adib. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
Karimi, F. (2013). The Emergence and Evolution of the Principle of Information Disclosure in International Environmental Law. Qom: University of Qom].
Katouzian, N. (2006). General Theory of Obligations. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
Kessler, F., & Edith, F. (1963). Culpa in Contrahendo, Bargaining in Good Faith, and Freedom of Contract: A Comparative StudyJO - Harvard Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339028
Khorsandian, M. A., & Amiri, M. (2018). Comparative Study of Obligations of Parties in Service Contracts in Iranian and European Law. Comparative Legal Studies, 9(1), 121-146.
Kotz, H. (2000). Precontractual Duties of Disclosure: A Comparative and Economic Perspective. European Journal of Law and Economics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018705216148
Kucher, A. N. (2004). Pre-contractual Liability: Protecting the Rights of the Parties Engaged in Negotiations. NYU-paper.doc.
Mikelenas, V. (2005). The Main Features of the New Lithuanian Contract Law System Based on the Civil Code of 2000. Juridica International(No.1), 42-50.
Mirghasem, J. (2001). Buyer's Right to Withhold Performance and Termination of Contract: A Comparative Study Under English Law, Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980, Iranian and Shi'ah Law. Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Moradian, S. (2015). Civil Liability of Producers in Providing Information Related to Goods. Kermanshah: Razi University].
Nayiri, B. (1999). A Comparative Study of Specific Performance Provisions in the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.
Neumann, T. (2012). The Duty to Cooperate in International Sales / The Scope of and role of Article 80. Sellier. European Law Publishers, Munich, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866539624
Safaee, S. H. (2014). International Sale Law. Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Safaee, S. H., & Alfat, N. (2010). Mandatory Enforcement of Specific Performance and Its Priority Over Contract Termination. Mofid Letter(79).
Sajadi, K. (2011). Comparative Study of Good Faith in the Principles of European Contract Law, International Commercial Contracts, and Iranian Law. Tabriz: University of Tabriz.
Salehi, J., & Ebrahimi, Y. (2012). Foundations and Scope of the Obligation to Provide Information to Consumers of Goods. Civil Law Knowledge Journal, 1(1), 61-74.
Schulze, R. (2006). Conclusion of Contract. ERA-Forum, 7(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-006-0051-7
Shaarian Sattari, E., & Shirin Beigpour, R. (2019). The Impact of Different Types of Contract Breaches on Remedies with Emphasis on International Documents. Private Law Research, 7(26), 213-242.
Soltanian, D. (2019). Examining the Obligation to Provide Information in Insurance Contracts During the Pre-Contractual Stage in English and Iranian Law. Tehran: University of Justice].
Yusefzadeh, A., Rostam Zadeh Asli, S., & Mirian, I. (2021). Comparative Study of the Obligation of the Promisee to Cooperate in the Execution of Obligations in Jurisprudence, Iranian Law, and International Commercial Contracts. Comparative Studies of Islamic and Western Law, 8(1), 259-288ER -.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fatemeh Khatamifar (Author); Jalil Ghanavati; Alireza Azarbayjani (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.