Electronic Sale in the Legal Systems of Iran and England

Authors

    Maryam Ghahremani Graduate Student, Department of Private Law, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Simin Asadzadeh * Department of Law, Kham.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran Asadzadeh.simin@iau.ac.ir

Keywords:

Electronic sale, England, option of session (khiyar al-majlis), acceptance, electronic contract formation, electronic offer, electronic acceptance, traditional method, modern method.

Abstract

In this study, the author examines the concept of electronic sale within the legal frameworks of Iran and England. Electronic sale is one of the contemporary phenomena that has evolved as a result of technological advancement. Today, merchants engage in commerce through electronic communications. Since a healthy and dynamic economy is considered one of the hallmarks of a country’s progress and development, understanding the laws governing electronic sales in today’s world is of great significance. Moreover, if traders and their legal representatives are thoroughly familiar with the laws of their foreign trade partners, they will be in a better position to conclude valid contracts. The author explores the strengths and weaknesses of each of the legal systems of Iran and England in regard to electronic sale. The study points out that, under the Iranian legal system, the moment of dispatch of acceptance constitutes the moment of contract formation, while in the English legal system, it is the moment of receipt of acceptance that determines the formation of the contract. According to Iranian law, legitimacy is recognized under Clause 4 of Article 190 and Article 217 of the Civil Code. The principle of party autonomy is enshrined in Article 967 of the Iranian Civil Code, and the doctrine of the delayed application of the governing law in electronic sale is accepted. In contrast, under the English legal system, the law of the place of dispatch of acceptance is deemed the governing law for electronic sale. It is worth noting that England has acceded to the UNCITRAL Model Law. The UNCITRAL Model Law refers extensively to provisions related to electronic commerce in many of its articles. It is regarded as one of the most significant international instruments and has been adopted by many countries worldwide. Therefore, in this study, the author attempts, through a descriptive-analytical research method, to examine the legal provisions related to electronic sale.

References

Abdoli, R., Afsharnia, T., & Rajabzadeh Estahbani, A. (2022). Governing Laws on Electronic Contracts from the Perspective of Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Iranian Codified Law. Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Jurisprudence(8).

Abedian Kalkhoran, M., & Nejat Zadegan, S. (2022). The Time of Smart Contract Formation from the Perspective of Iranian, English, and American Law. Comparative Research Quarterly on Islamic and Western Law, 10(2), 133-135.

Abhari, H., & Khariki, M. F. (2020). Unfair Terms in Electronic Commercial Contracts in Iranian and European Law. Comparative Legal Research JournalVL - 4(5).

Akbarineh, P., & Mahmoudzadeh, F. (2016). Electronic Contracts. International Congress on Islamic Sciences and Humanities,

Amini, E., & Vali, A. (2024, 17 January 2024). Comparative Study of Termination of Electronic Transactions in Iranian and English Law. 8th International Conference on Research in Engineering Sciences and 5th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Development in Asia, Bangkok University, Thailand.

Ansaripour, M. A., & Sohani, M. (2020). The Concept of Voidable Contracts in English, French, Iranian Law, and Jurisprudence. Comparative Research Quarterly on Islamic and Western Law, 8(2).

Ardebili, A. i. M. (1403). Majma' al-Fa'idah wal-Burhan fi Sharh Irshad al-Adhhan (Vol. 7).

Bellia, J. A. (2001). Contracting with Electronic agent. Journal Artiches NotreBmelaw school NDL schooralship, 50.

Ghoboli Darafshan, S. M. T., & Ghoboli Darafshan, S. M. H. (2012). Criteria for Distinguishing Sale and Exchange in Iranian Law with a Comparative Approach to English Law. Journal of Comparative Legal Research, 16(3).

Katouzian, S. N. (2001). Proof and Evidence of Proof. Mizan Publications.

Moradi Golestan, M. (2022). Jurisprudential and Legal Examination of Electronic Termination. Judicial Journal(154).

Najafi, M. H. (1999). Jawahir al-Kalam. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Panahi, H., Gharibeh, A., & Pashazadeh, H. (2022). Feasibility of Liability for Intelligent Electronic Software in Cases of Errors and Mistakes in Iranian and Common Law. International Legal Research Journal, 15(55).

Payton, D. A. (2004). Electronic contracts:An analysis of the law applicable to electronic contract in English and Walles And its role in facilating the growth of electronics university]. Walles Abreys.

Rahbari, E., & Rezaei, A. (2011). The Role of Electronic Agents in Contract Formation. Quarterly Journal of Law - Faculty of Law and Political Science, 41(4).

Saidi Moghadam, H., & Pouravzan, M. R. (2021). Analytical Examination of Contract Formation and Elements of Electronic Contract Formation. International Quarterly of Legal Yar, 5(17).

Tabatabai Yazdi, S. M. K. (1420). Al-'Urwah al-Wuthqa. Islamic Publishing Institute.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

Submitted

2024-12-27

Revised

2025-01-16

Accepted

2025-02-02

How to Cite

Ghahremani, M. ., & Asadzadeh, S. (2025). Electronic Sale in the Legal Systems of Iran and England. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 4(1), 1-8. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/148

Similar Articles

11-20 of 101

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.