The Role of Force Majeure and Hardship in the Termination of Iranian Oil Contracts: An Analysis of Judicial Practice and International Arbitration

Authors

    Abbas Kazemi Najafabadi Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabae'i University, Tehran, Iran
    Seyyed Ghasem Zamani Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabae’i University, Tehran, Iran
    Mahmoud Jamshidvand * PhD student in Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabae’i University, Tehran, Iran Jamshidvand.md@gmail.com

Keywords:

Iranian oil contracts, force majeure, hardship, contract termination, international arbitration

Abstract

The oil industry in Iran, due to its capital-intensive and long-term nature, has consistently faced geopolitical risks, market volatility, and legal and political fluctuations. This reality significantly reinforces the necessity of drafting oil contracts in a manner that enables them to withstand crises and unforeseeable circumstances. The concepts of force majeure and hardship are recognized as fundamental tools for managing such conditions and ensuring contractual equilibrium. The absence of precise and explicit drafting of these concepts in Iranian oil contracts has resulted in costly disputes before domestic courts and international arbitral tribunals. This article aims to analyze the role of force majeure and hardship in the termination and adaptation of Iranian oil contracts and to examine international arbitral approaches to these concepts. It seeks to identify effective legal mechanisms for aligning oil contracts with global economic and political developments as well as domestic conditions, emphasizing the importance of accurate and anticipatory incorporation of these clauses in contractual texts. The present study endeavors to examine the legal status and functional significance of force majeure and hardship in Iranian oil contracts, reassess the gap between theoretical constructs and practical application, and propose corrective strategies and practical recommendations to strengthen contractual security and enhance the credibility of Iran’s oil contractual regime.

References

Al-Emadi, T. A. (2011). The Hardship and Force Majeure Clauses in International Petroleum Joint Venture Agreements. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1878558

Āsāyesh, K. (2024). Comparison of Iranian Arbitration Law with ICC Arbitration Rules. https://ir-lawyer.com/blogs/comparison-of-iranian-arbitration-with-icc

Bahādor, M., & Rāstgūy Mashhūr, Ḥ. (2018). Invoking International Economic Sanctions as Force Majeure. Internal Quarterly of the Bar Association(17), 49-68.

Behdādnīā, Y., Żiyā'ī, S. Y., & Mashhadī, A. (2023). Theories Governing Oil Contracts from the Perspective of International Arbitration Awards. International Studies Quarterly, 169-189.

Daadoush, G. H. (2024). The Contractual Practice and Legal Framework Applicable to Investor-States Contracts, Critical Discussion of the Quotes: The Principle of Sanctity of Contracts (pacta sunt servanda) as the Leading Maxim of Contract Law Generally has Priority over Changes in the Surrounding Economic Conditions.

Dārā'ī, M. H. (2015). Comparative Study of Contract Performance in English, American, and Iranian Law. Comparative Law Quarterly of Tehran University, 6(1), 107-150.

Dehqān, Z., & Amīnī, M. (2022). Claiming Force Majeure Based on COVID-19 in LNG Sales Contracts. Energy Legal Studies Journal, 8(1), 67-89.

Ebrāhīmī, S. N., & Ovyārḥosein, S. (2012). The Effects of Sanctions on the Execution of International Commercial Contracts from the Perspective of Force Majeure. Scientific Biannual of Civil Law Knowledge(1), 1-18.

Emāmī, S. H. (2018). Law of Oil Contracts. Mizan Publishing.

Epc Contract for Engineering, P., & Construction. (2024). EPC Contract for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) for Industrial Works.

Esfandiyārī Khāledī, A., Jalālī Karūh, M., & Ra'īsī Dezakī, L. (2022). Investigating and Comparing the Status of Force Majeure and Impossibility of Contract in Iranian Oil Contracts. Energy Economic Studies Quarterly(72), 207-226.

Faghīhī Moḥammadī, V. (2019). Forecasting the Hardship Clause in International Contracts | Dādforān Mehr Pāw Legal Institute. https://pav.legal/posts/4207

Farimani, F. M., Mu, X., Sahebhonar, H., & Taherifard, A. (2020). An economic analysis of Iranian petroleum contract. Petroleum Science, 17(5), 1451-1461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00486-2

Farrokhānī, H., Ghorbānī Lāchavānī, M., & Aṣārīān, S. (2022). Comparative Study of the Frustration of Upstream Oil and Gas Contracts in Iranian Legal System and Common Law. Energy Legal Studies, 8(1), 155-171.

Global Arbitration, R. (2024). Upstream Oil and Gas Dispute. Global Arbitration Review Journal.

Karāylū, M. (2025). Hardship and Force Majeure in Contracting Agreements and their Effects on the Parties' Obligations. https://hamyarmetror.ir/hardship-force-majeure/#lwptoc6

Kātūzīān, N. (2009). General Rules of Contracts (Vol. 2). University of Tehran.

Lorenz, & Partners. (2025). Comparison of commonly used Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses in International Contracts. https://www.lorenz-partners.com/wp content/uploads/2024/09/NL119E-Force-Majeure-and-Hardship-Clauses-in-International-Contracts-Jul25.pdf

Mīr Shekārī, A., & Ḥoseinī, S. M. A. (2021). Sanctions as Force Majeure with Emphasis on Judicial Procedure. Scientific-Specialized Quarterly of Legal Encyclopedia(4), 160-195.

Moḥammadī, S., Aṣgharī Āghmasḥhadī, F., & Ḥājī Ḥoseinī, M. J. (2015). Investigating the Specific Rules of Upstream Oil Contracts with Emphasis on the New Oil Contract known as IPC. Administrative Law Biannual, 3(9), 113-135.

Rafī'ī, M. T., & Rajabī, Ī. (2021). Comparative Study of Force Majeure and Hardship in Oil and Gas Investment Contracts with Emphasis on International and Regional Instruments. Energy Legal Studies Journal, 229-252.

Sha'ārīān, & et al. (2020). COVID-19 and its Impact on Contract Performance: The Position of Iranian Law. https://www.tilolawyers.com/Portals/8/covid19-fa.pdf

Sharīfī, S. I. D., & Ṣafarī, N. (2013). Comparison of the Theory of Hardship and Force Majeure in the Principles of Commercial Contract Law, Principles of European Contract Law, and Iranian Law. Journal of Comparative Legal Research, 17(4), 113-114.

Shāyegān Law, F. (2022). Familiarity with the Concepts of Force Majeure and Hardship in Contracts. shayeganlawfirm.com

Unidroit. (2016). UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016. https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-bl.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2025-08-05

Revised

2025-12-15

Accepted

2025-12-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kazemi Najafabadi, A. ., Zamani, S. G. ., & Jamshidvand, M. (2026). The Role of Force Majeure and Hardship in the Termination of Iranian Oil Contracts: An Analysis of Judicial Practice and International Arbitration. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-10. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/316

Similar Articles

101-110 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.