Legal and Ethical Challenges Related to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administrative Justice System
Keywords:
Administrative Justice, Artificial Intelligence, Legal, Ethical ChallengeAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence in administrative justice has been widely discussed in Iran. The challenges and problems of designing a scheduling system in provincial offices and enforcement branches and organizing the petition writing unit of the Administrative Court of Justice are among the issues that increase the need for artificial intelligence, and expert solutions must be provided. In addition to providing new opportunities to improve efficiency and accuracy, artificial intelligence brings numerous legal and ethical challenges. The present study aims to investigate and analyze the legal and ethical challenges of using artificial intelligence in the administrative justice system. The most important challenges were carefully examined in light of previous studies, and solutions were proposed as far as possible. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive and multifaceted approaches, including developing legal and ethical frameworks, increasing system transparency, and maintaining human oversight. The present study emphasizes the use of artificial intelligence in administrative justice and suggests that artificial intelligence be used as a predictive algorithm in the Administrative Justice Court.
References
Abrishami Rad, M. A. A. U. A. N. H. (2022). Optimization Administrative Justice Court based on the Status and Competence of the Oppression Court in Iran and Islam. The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law, 4(12), 129-148.
Aghaeitogh, M. (2023). Administrative Justice in Iran Oscillating Between Monism and DualismPB - Springer.
Aloamaka, P. C., & Omozue, M. O. (2024). AI and Human Rights: Navigating Ethical and Legal Challenges in Developing Nations. Khazanah Hukum, 6(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i2.37801
Anna, B. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: Issues and Outlooks. Legal Issues in the Digital Age(3), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2024.3.68.87
Baldi, V., & Oliveira, L. (2022). Challenges to incorporate accountability into artificial intelligence. Procedia Computer Science, 204, 519-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.063
Buccella, A. (2023). "AI for all" is a matter of social justice. Ai and Ethics, 3(4), 1143-1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00222-z
Butt, J. S. (2024). The impact of digitalization (AI) on administrative decision-making processes and access to justice-A Nordic perspective. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 20(1), 22-42.
Clément, M. (2017). Les juges doivent-ils craindre l'arrivée de l'intelligence artificielle? Recueil Dalloz(2), 102-106.
Coglianese, C., & Dor, L. M. B. (2020). AI in Adjudication and Administration (Vol. 86).
Cotran, E., & Sherif, A. O. (2023). Democracy: The Rule of Law and Islam. Brill.
Daly, P. (2023). Artificial Administration: Administrative Law, Administrative Justice and Accountability in the Age of Machines.
Drakokhrust, T., & Martsenko, N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in the Modern Judicial System. J Mod Educ Res(1). https://doi.org/10.53964/jmer.2022005
Duclercq, J. B. (2018). Les algorithmes en procès. Revue française de droit administratif(01), 131.
Hertogh, M., Kirkham, R., Thomas, R., & Tomlinson, J. (2022). The Oxford handbook of administrative justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.001.0001
Hildreth, W. B., Miller, G. A. U. R. J., & Hildreth, W. B. (2021). Handbook of public administration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270680
Holler, R., & Tarshish, N. (2024). Administrative burden in citizen-state encounters: The role of waiting, communication breakdowns and administrative errors. Social Policy and Society, 23(3), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000355
Hunter, D., Bagaric, M., & Stobbs, N. (2019). A framework for the efficient and ethical use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system. Fla. St. UL Rev., 47, 749.
Jacobs, L. (2024). Access to administrative justice as an administrative law value: Designing an inclusive and accessible administrative justice system. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 40, 158-183. https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v40.9184
Kuhlmann, S., Wollmann, H., & Reiter, R. (2025). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lasserre, M. C. (2017). L'intelligence artificielle au service du droit: la justice prédictive, la justice du futur? Les Petites Affiches.
Manheim, K., & Kaplan, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Risks to privacy and democracy. Yale JL & Tech.VL - 21, 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3020021
Naderifard, M., Mojtehedi, M., & Ranjbari, A. (2022). The effect of the principle of precedence of the jurisdiction of the administrative courts in the realization of justice in France; A look at its implementation in the Iranian administrative law system. Journal of Legal Research, 20(48), 185-213.
Nadjia, M. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on legal systems: challenges and opportunities. Проблеми законності(164), 285-303.
Nouri, Z., Salah, W. B., & AlOmran, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Justice: An Analysis of Predictive Justice in France. Hasanuddin Law Review, 10(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i2.5541
Novelli, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024). Accountability in artificial intelligence: what it is and how it works. Ai & Society, 39(4), 1871-1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y
Olsen, T. D. (2023). Seeking Justice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009293280
Patidar, N., Mishra, S., Jain, R., Prajapati, D., Solanki, A., Suthar, R., & Patel, H. (2024). Transparency in AI decision making: A survey of explainable AI methods and applications (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.23880/art-16000110
Pulivarthy, P., & Whig, P. (2025). Bias and Fairness Addressing Discrimination in AI Systems. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4147-6.ch005
Rajendran, R. K., Vetrivel, S., & Nr, W. B. (2025). The Role of AI in Enhancing Access to Justice and Legal Services. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7205-0.ch008
Re, R. M., & Solow-Niederman, A. (2019). Developing artificially intelligent justice. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 22, 242.
Rubin, E. L., & Feeley, M. M. (2021). Criminal Justice Through Management: From Police, Prosecutors, Courts, and Prisons to a Modern Administrative Agency. Or. L. Rev., 100SP - 261.
Turing, A. M. (2009). Computing machinery and intelligence. Springer.
Viktorovna, P. I., & Aleksandrovich, Z. A. (2022). Administrative Justice. Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики(3), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2022.3.131.148
Yanamala, A. K. Y., & Suryadevara, S. (2023). Advances in Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Challenges. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations, 1(01), 294-319.
Završnik, A. (2021). Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings (Vol. 18). https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819876762
Zekos, G. I. (2022). Advanced artificial intelligence and robo-justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98206-5
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2018). Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making. Council of Europe, Directorate General of Democracy.