Examining the Financial Liabilities Arising from Self-Driving Car Accidents in Iranian and Islamic Law

Authors

    Javad Mollaei Shandaki Department of Jurisprudence and Islamic Fundamentals, Bi.C., Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran
    Hassan Gowth * Department of Jurisprudence and Islamic Fundamentals, Bi.C., Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran h.Ghowth@iau.ac.ir
    Ali Chakandinezhad Department of Jurisprudence and Islamic Fundamentals, Bi.C., Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

Keywords:

Self-driving cars, liability, tasbib, dhaman, artificial intelligence, criminal and civil liability

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of modern technologies and the emergence of self-driving cars, novel jurisprudential and legal challenges have arisen, particularly regarding liability in traffic accidents. Self-driving vehicles, which function autonomously through artificial intelligence (AI) systems, create complexities in determining responsibility when accidents or damages occur. This study explores the jurisprudential dimensions of liability stemming from incidents involving autonomous vehicles and seeks to address two fundamental questions. First, can liability arising from malfunctions or errors in automated systems be attributed to artificial intelligence itself or its designers, based on jurisprudential principles such as al-tasbīb (causation) and al-ḍamān (guarantee), or does the responsibility remain with human agents, including drivers? Second, when accidents occur at varying levels of automation, how should criminal and civil liabilities be apportioned among the driver, manufacturer, and software developers of the vehicle? The findings indicate that determining liability for self-driving car accidents in Islamic jurisprudence requires a precise interpretative approach that aligns with the principles and objectives of Sharia. Based on the principles of al-tasbīb and al-ḍamān, liability may be jointly attributed to AI system designers, technology manufacturers, and, under certain interpretations, the autonomous system itself. In particular, when technical errors or misjudgments occur during automated decision-making, the central jurisprudential question becomes whether accountability should rest with human actors or whether the autonomous systems—and by extension, their design and programming—should be recognized as the primary liable entities. At different levels of vehicle automation, both criminal and civil liabilities vary according to the extent of human versus system involvement. Therefore, the results of this research underscore the necessity of establishing a transparent and equitable framework for distributing responsibility among drivers, AI developers, and automobile manufacturers. Such an allocation of liability must be consistent with the maqāṣid al-sharīʿa (objectives of Islamic law) and uphold the protection of human life, property, and rights.

References

Abbaszadeh, M. (2022). A study of the legal responsibility of autonomous vehicles in Islamic law. Legal Publications.

Abozaid, H. (2024). The legal responsibility of autonomous vehicles: An Islamic perspective. Islamic Law Review, 19(2), 80-95.

Al-Hurr al-Amili, M. i. H. (1985). Wasail al-Shi'ah. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Al-Kubaisi, A. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in Islamic jurisprudence and its legal challenges. Journal of Jurisprudence and Technology, 3(1), 30-45.

Al-Sarakhsi, S. (2020). Fiqh Economics: Financial responsibilities in Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Publications.

Al-Tusi, M. i. H. (1985). Tahdhid al-Ahkam fi Sharh al-Muqni'a. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya.

Al-Tusi, T. (1987). Foundations of liability in Islamic law. Hawza Publications.

Asran, M. (2023). Responsibility in Islamic Law and Autonomous Technology. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, 9(1), 90-105.

Balhani, S., & Ghilani, R. (2017). Causality in criminal law. Full Thesis. Responsibility in contracts in Islamic jurisprudence and Algerian civil law University of Prince Abd al-Qader for Islamic Sciences].

Barzegar, A., Amiri, T., & Amir, K. (2021). Feasibility of using duress defense by the programmer of autonomous vehicles based on the principles of Iranian criminal law and related case law regarding duress killings in common law. Comparative Islamic and Western Law Research, 8(1), 1-26.

Barzegar, A., & Ilham, F. (2020). Islamic legal perspectives on autonomous vehicle technologies. Journal of Islamic Law and Technology, 5(2), 15-30.

Fathi, M. (2023). Jurisprudential challenges in dealing with autonomous vehicles. Journal of Jurisprudential Studies, 14(2), 67-85.

Ibn Qudamah, M. (1980). Al-Kafi fi Fiqh al-Shafi'iya. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.

Ibn Taymiyyah, S. (1983). Al-Fiqh al-Fiqhi fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Dar al-Kutub.

Ibn Zahra Halabi, H. i. A. i. Z. (1988). Ghina al-Nuzua Ila 'Ilmi al-Usul wa al-Furu'. Imam Sadiq (AS) Foundation.

Ibn Zahra, S. a.-D. (1988). Al-Fiqh wa Ahkamu. University of Tehran Publications.

Islami, J. (2024). The impact of autonomous vehicles on the jurisprudence of liability and fault. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, 22(1), 78-92.

Jafari, N. (2023). A jurisprudential review of responsibilities in autonomous vehicle accidents. Islamic Law, 20(3), 45-60.

Mohibbi, R. (2024). The role of Islamic jurisprudence in determining the responsibility of autonomous vehicles. Journal of Jurisprudence and Ethics, 7(3), 56-70.

Mousavi, A. (2023). A jurisprudential analysis of accidents and responsibility in autonomous vehicles. Journal of Contemporary Jurisprudence, 17(2), 91-108.

Najafi, S. M. (1983). Al-Shara'ia fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Ayatollah Najafi Library Publications.

Rezai, H., Kashavarz, S., Sadeghian, S., Shiri, & Fattah. (2018). Criminal and civil liability of lawyers in the context of their duties towards the client, with an emphasis on citizens' rights. Journal of Medical Law Research, 12, 79-91.

Tawahiya, K. (2017). Responsibility in contracts in Islamic jurisprudence and Algerian civil law University of Prince Abd al-Qader for Islamic Sciences].

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

Submitted

2025-03-14

Revised

2025-09-05

Accepted

2025-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mollaei Shandaki, J. ., Gowth, H., & Chakandinezhad, A. . (2025). Examining the Financial Liabilities Arising from Self-Driving Car Accidents in Iranian and Islamic Law. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-9. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/252

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.