The Evolution of Cyber Tort Liability: Conceptual Challenges in Algorithm-Induced Harm
Keywords:
Cyber tort liability, algorithm-induced harm, artificial intelligence, legal responsibility, causation, duty of care, autonomous systems, algorithmic governance, digital regulation, emerging technologiesAbstract
The rapid advancement of algorithmic and autonomous decision-making systems has fundamentally reshaped the nature, sources, and pathways of harm in the digital age, challenging the foundational assumptions of traditional tort law. As machine learning, predictive analytics, and neural networks increasingly influence medical, commercial, administrative, and social environments, legal systems struggle to reconcile long-standing doctrines with emerging forms of injury that arise from opaque, adaptive, and probabilistic computational processes. This narrative review adopts a descriptive–analytic approach to examine the historical evolution of cyber tort liability, beginning with early internet harms such as defamation, intrusion, software negligence, and cybersecurity breaches, and moving through transitional phases marked by platform liability debates and the growing influence of algorithmic content curation. The review then analyzes the conceptual and doctrinal tensions exposed by algorithm-induced harms, including challenges of causation, foreseeability, duty of care, standard of reasonableness, attribution, vicarious liability, and the classification of algorithms as products, services, or sui generis entities. It further surveys emerging regulatory responses across jurisdictions, including the European Union’s risk-based AI governance approach, the fragmented U.S. reliance on traditional tort principles and platform immunity, the nuanced common-law adaptations in the UK, Canada, and Australia, and Asia’s increasingly administrative models of algorithmic oversight. International soft-law instruments are also examined for their role in harmonizing global approaches. The review concludes that algorithmic systems generate structural contradictions within tort doctrine, revealing the need for conceptual reframing and new liability models that can accommodate distributed agency, systemic harms, and technological opacity. These insights offer a foundation for future legal scholarship and policy development aimed at ensuring accountability in an era defined by autonomous digital systems.
References
Alyami, A. S., Majrashi, N. A., & Shubayr, N. A. (2021). Radiologists’ and Radiographers’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging in Saudi Arabia (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.35765
Bączyk-Rozwadowska, K. (2022). Civil Liability for Damages Caused in Connection With the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. PPM, 3(3-4), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.70537/z7xnk378
Bashayreh, M. H., Tabbara, A., & Sibai, F. N. (2023). The Need for a Legal Standard of Care in the AI Environment. Sriwijaya Law Review, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol7.iss1.1507.pp73-86
Brogan, J. (2021). The Next Era of Biomedical Research. Voices in Bioethics, 7. https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v7i.8854
Cestonaro, C., Delicati, A., Marcante, B., Caenazzo, L., & Tozzo, P. (2023). Defining Medical Liability When Artificial Intelligence Is Applied on Diagnostic Algorithms: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Medicine, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1305756
Chagal-Feferkorn, K. (2021). How Can I Tell if My Algorithm Was Reasonable? Michigan Technology Law Review(27.2), 213. https://doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.27.2.how
Dyson, M. R. (2022). Combatting AI’s Protectionism &Amp; Totalitarian-Coded Hypnosis: The Case for AI Reparations &Amp; Antitrust Remedies in the Ecology of Collective Self-Determination. Smu Law Review, 75(3), 625. https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.75.3.7
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Jingwa, K. A., Okoye, O. K., Okah, M. J., Ladele, J. A., Farah, A. H., & Alimi, H. A. (2023). Ethical Implications of AI and Robotics in Healthcare: A Review. Medicine, 102(50), e36671. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036671
Gallese, C. (2022). Suggestions for a Revision of the European Smart Robot Liability Regime. Icair, 4(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.851
Ganapathy, K. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Regulatory and Legal Concerns. Telehealth and Medicine Today. https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v6.252
Gayvoronskaya, Y., & Galchun, E. A. (2021). The Harm Caused by Artificial Intelligence: Aspects of Responsibility and Legal Personality. Advances in Law Studies, 9(4), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2021-9-4-76-80
Huberman, P. (2020). Tort Law, Corrective Justice and the Problem of Autonomous-Machine-Caused Harm. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 34(1), 105-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.3
Kharitonova, Y. S., Savina, V., & Pagnini, F. (2022). Civil Liability in the Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Systems: Basic Approaches. Вестник Пермского Университета Юридические Науки(4(58)), 683-708. https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-683-708
McDonald, L. (2023). AI Systems and Liability: An Assessment of the Applicability of Strict Liability &Amp; A Case for Limited Legal Personhood for AI. St Andrews Law Journal, 3(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.15664/stalj.v3i1.2645
Moodley, K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Augmented Intelligence? How Big Data and AI Are Transforming Healthcare: Challenges and Opportunities. South African Medical Journal, 114(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2024.v114i1.1631
Mosaddeque, A., Rowshon, M., Ahmed, T., Twaha, U., & Babu, B. N. (2022). The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Fortifying Cybersecurity Systems in the US Healthcare Industry. Ijss, 1(2), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v1i2.101
O’Sullivan, S., Nevejans, N., Allen, C., Blyth, A., Léonard, S., Pagallo, U., Holzinger, K., Holzinger, A., Sajid, M. I., & Ashrafian, H. (2019). Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Frameworks for Development of Standards in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Robotic Surgery. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1968
Sqalli, M. T., Aslonov, B., Gafurov, M., & Nurmatov, S. (2023). Humanizing AI in Medical Training: Ethical Framework for Responsible Design. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1189914
Tretyakova, E. P. (2021). Using Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Allocating Liability and Risks. Digital Law Journal, 2(4), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-4-51-60
Zelinski, C. (2023). Chatbots, Generative Ai, and Scholarly Manuscripts Wame Recommendations on Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Scholarly Publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute, 37(3), 221-224. https://doi.org/10.54079/jpmi.37.3.3284
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.