A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Role of Gender in Iranian Criminal Law with Emphasis on the Concept of Contextual Justice

Authors

    Ahmad Reza Nakhjiri Ph.D. student, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, NT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Reza Partovi Zadeh * Department of Theology, NT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 0041309111@iau.ir
    Roghayeh Shahabi Department of Theology, VaP.C., Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran

Keywords:

Imami jurisprudence, protective criminal policy, no-harm rule, avoidance of hudud in cases of doubt, expediency (maslahah), child marriage

Abstract

The criminal law system in Imami jurisprudence is not solely based on the criminalization of conduct and the imposition of punishments; rather, it encompasses a set of limiting and protective rules aimed at preventing the unjust expansion of criminal liability and safeguarding vulnerable individuals. Principles such as “no harm” (la darar), “preservation of life” (hifz al-nafs), and “the avoidance of hudud punishments in cases of doubt” (dar’ al-hudud bi al-shubuhat) are among the most important jurisprudential foundations for restricting the scope of punishments, and they play a significant role in maintaining a balance between the enforcement of criminal justice and the protection of individual rights. Within this framework, the issue of marriage involving minors can be examined as one of the key areas of protective intervention. Although Imami jurisprudence recognizes the authority of a guardian (wali) over the marriage of a minor, the exercise of this authority is conditioned upon the observance of the ward’s best interests, and in cases where such interests are absent or harm is present, its legitimacy becomes questionable. Contemporary jurisprudence, by drawing on theories such as “governmental jurisprudence” and “interest-oriented jurisprudence,” has expanded the scope of this protective approach and has enabled legislative intervention to protect children and prevent social harm. This theoretical development is also reflected in certain contemporary legal provisions and indicates a gradual transition from a purely individual-centered approach toward a framework grounded in protective and social welfare considerations in criminal policy. The present study, using a descriptive-analytical method and drawing upon jurisprudential and legal sources, examines the role of these principles in limiting the scope of criminal liability and strengthening protective mechanisms for vulnerable groups.

References

Ansari, M. (1995). Al-Makasib. Muassasat al-Nashr al-Islami.

Ardebili, M. A. (2019). General Criminal Law, Volume 1. Mizan.

Ardebili, M. A. (2020). General Criminal Law. Mizan.

Baqir al-Sadr, M. (1985). Durus fi Ilm al-Usul. Dar al-Taaruf.

Daneshmand Kermani, M. R. (2020). Social Interest and Its Role in Jurisprudential Developments of Family Law. Journal of Fiqh and Foundations of Islamic Law.

Fazel Lankarani, M. (2004). Tafsil al-Shariah fi Sharh Tahrir al-Wasilah, Book of Hudud. Markaz Fiqhi Aemme Athar.

Goldouzian, I. (2019). Essentials of General Criminal Law. Mizan.

Habibzadeh, M. J. (2018). Foundations of Criminal Law. SAMT.

Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.

Hilli, H. i. Y. (1987). Qawaid al-Ahkam fi Marifat al-Halal wa al-Haram. Muassasat al-Nashr al-Islami.

Hurr Amili, M. i. H. (1988). Wasa'il al-Shia. Muassasat Al al-Bayt.

Javadi Amoli, A. (2009). Philosophy of Human Rights. Esra.

Khoei, S. A. (1989). Misbah al-Fiqahah. Institute for Revival of the Works of Imam al-Khoei.

Khoei, S. A. (1997). Mabani Takmilat al-Minhaj. Institute for Revival of the Works of Imam al-Khoei.

Khomeini, R. (1983). Tahrir al-Wasilah. Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.

Khomeini, R. (1989). Sahifeh-ye Imam. Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.

Khorasani, M. K. (1988). Kifayat al-Usul. Muassasat Al al-Bayt.

Makarem Shirazi, N. (2006). Anwar al-Fiqahah, Book of Hudud. Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School.

Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (2012). Islamic Legal Theory. Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.

Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, H. (2020). Crimes Against Persons. Mizan.

Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, H. (2021). General Criminal Law. Mizan.

Mohaqeq Damad, S. M. (1995). Jurisprudential Rules, Civil Section. Markaz Nashr-e Olum-e Eslami.

Mohaqeq Damad, S. M. (2007). Jurisprudential Rules, Civil Section. Markaz Nashr-e Olum-e Eslami.

Momen Qomi, M. (2013). Jurisprudential Foundations of the Islamic Legal System. Bustan-e Ketab.

Najafi, M. H. (1988). Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shara'i al-Islam. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Robinson, P. H. (1997). Structure and Function in Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.

Sadeghi, H. (2018). Protective Criminal Policy Toward Children in Iranian Law. Legal Research Quarterly.

Sadeghi, H. (2019). Analysis of the Elements of Crime in Iranian Criminal Law. Mizan.

Safaei, S. H., & Emami, A. (2014). Family Law. Mizan.

Shabzendehdar, M. M. (2015). Foundations of Ijtihad and Legal Inference. Markaz Fiqhi Aemme Athar.

Shahid Thani, Z. a.-D. A. (1992). Masalik al-Afham ila Tanqih Shara'i al-Islam. Muassasat al-Maarif al-Islamiyyah.

Shatibi, A. I. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shariah. Dar al-Marifah.

Sistani, A. (2010). Al-Fiqh lil-Mughtaribin. Office of Ayatollah Sistani.

Sobhani, J. (2009). Mawsuat al-Fiqh al-Islami al-Muqaran. Muassasat Imam Sadiq.

Tabrizi, J. (2005). Irshad al-Talib ila al-Taliq ala al-Makasib. Dar al-Fiqahah.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2026-01-01

Revised

2026-05-01

Accepted

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nakhjiri, A. R. ., Partovi Zadeh, R., & Shahabi , R. . (2026). A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Role of Gender in Iranian Criminal Law with Emphasis on the Concept of Contextual Justice. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-9. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/383

Similar Articles

1-10 of 196

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.