Analysis and Examination of the Consequences of Unilateral Exploitation of Shared Oil and Gas Fields in Light of International Law
Keywords:
shared oil and gas fields, international law, consequences of exploitationAbstract
The objective of the present study is to analyze and examine the consequences of unilateral exploitation of shared oil and gas fields in light of international law. The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on library sources. Since the method of exploiting a shared reservoir must be agreed upon by the interested states, states must consequently negotiate with the aim of reaching an agreement, precisely similar to what exists with respect to the delimitation of the continental shelf. States must enter into negotiations in good faith and with the objective of achieving appropriate cooperative arrangements for the exploitation of the resource that include all interested states; however, these negotiations should not necessarily be directed toward joint exploitation. In principle, the states concerned have no obligation to conclude such arrangements. Rather, they are only required to negotiate about them. The International Law Commission should resume its work in this field and draft a final instrument that could be used as a guideline when states seek to develop transboundary oil and gas reserves. In doing so, the International Law Commission should overcome political pressures, examine all sources of international law studied in this research, and review its previous work, for example, on the law of transboundary aquifers. Peaceful, efficient, and cooperative exploitation of these transboundary reserves is vital for the global economy and for the social development of all states involved.
References
Bankes, N. (2016). The Regime for Transboundary Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Maritime Delimitation Treaties and Other Related Agreements of Arctic Coastal States. Ocean Development & International Law, 47, 141-144.
Bastida, A. (2006). Cross-Border Unitization and Joint Development Agreements: An International Law Perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 29, 355.
Cameron, P. D. (2006). The Rules of Engagement: Developing Cross-Border Petroleum Deposits in the North Sea and the Caribbean. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55, 559.
Charney, J. I., & Alexander, L. M. (1993). Bahrain-Saudi Arabia Boundary Agreement Dated 22 February 1958. In International Maritime Boundaries (Vol. 2, pp. 1489-1497).
Kashani, J. (2014). Shared Oil and Gas Resources from the Perspective of International Law (2 ed.). Shahr-e Danesh Publications.
Lagoni, R. (1979). Oil and Gas Deposits Across National Frontiers. The American Journal of International Law, 73, 215.
Ong, D. M. Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: Mere State Practice or.
United Nations Working Group on Shared Natural, R. (2010). Oral Report of the Working Group on Shared Natural Resources.
Weaver, J. L., & Asmus, D. F. (2006). Unitizing Oil and Gas Fields Around the World: A.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Reza Bahadoran (Author); Mohammadreza Hakakzadeh; Mashallah Heidarpour (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.