Reconsidering the Traditional Concept of Legal Personality in Light of Developments in Artificial Intelligence
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, legal personality, electronic personality, temporary legal personality, limited legalAbstract
The legal status of artificial intelligence remains uncertain, and one of the principal issues surrounding AI concerns whether it can possess legal personality. This question is becoming increasingly significant with the passage of time and the rapid advancement of this technology. Given the continuing development of digital technologies and the increasing autonomy of artificial intelligence systems, autonomous AI may, in the distant future, acquire independent rights and obligations and function as a legal actor alongside natural and legal persons. Certain normative and practical considerations determine how an artificial “other” should be treated as a potential rights-holder. The attribution of legal personality to artificial intelligence remains highly controversial among legal scholars; some support the recognition of AI as a legal person, whereas others oppose it. In any event, the recognition of legal personality for AI requires specific conditions, and not every form of artificial intelligence can acquire legal personality under all circumstances. Legal systems have proposed various approaches to addressing this issue, including the creation of electronic legal personality and the granting of temporary legal personality. This study proposes the recognition of limited legal personality for artificial intelligence.
References
Ahmed, O. (2021). Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Civil Law. Journal of Legal and Economic Research.
Al-Qawsi, H. (2020). Errors of the Artificial Intelligence-Powered Algorithmic Trading Robot: Prospects of Civil Liability in the Stock Market. Jeel Journal of In-depth Legal Research(41).
Al-Qousi, H. (2018). The Problem of the Person Responsible for Operating the Robot. Jeel Journal of In-depth Legal Research(25).
Al-Sharif, M. S. A. M. (2021). Criminal Liability of Humans: A Comparative Foundational Study. Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine, 3(1).
Al-Wali, A. S. A. (2021). Civil Liability for Harmful Effects of Artificial Intelligence Applications in UAE Law: A Comparative Analytical Study. Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya.
Almajid, W. M. (2010). Can Electronic Agents Be Granted Legal Personality under Islamic Law? Arab Law Quarterly, 24(4).
Bolotaeva, O. S. (2022). Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence. Law and State: Theory and Practice(4).
Bottomley, D., & Thaldar, D. (2023). Liability for Harm Caused by AI in Healthcare: An Overview of the Core Legal Concepts. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 14, 1297353.
Boudraa, K. (2025). Temporary Legal Personality for Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Legal Construct for Accountability (SSRN, Issue.
Buocz, T., & Eisenberger, I. (2023). Demystifying Legal Personhood for Non-Human Entities: A Kelsenian Approach. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.
Cauffman, C. (2018). Robo-Liability: The European Union in Search of the Best Way to Deal with Liability for Damage Caused by Artificial Intelligence. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(5), 532.
Cheong, B. C. (2021). Granting Legal Personhood to Artificial Intelligence Systems and Traditional Veil-Piercing Concepts to Impose Liability. Sn Social Sciences, 1(9).
Courtois, G. (2016). Robots intelligents et responsabilité: Quels régimes, quelles perspectives? Dalloz IP/IT(6), 287.
European, C. (2019). Liability for Artificial Intelligence and Other Emerging Digital Technologies.
Fath Al-Bab, M. R. A. (2021). The Legal Nature of Civil Liability for Robot Damages Mansoura University Conference,
Grapentin, J. (2018). Contract Formation and Contractual Fault in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Software Agents (Vol. 38). Nomos Verlag.
Hsiao, E. (2013). Whanganui River Agreement: Indigenous Rights and Rights of Nature. Environmental Policy and Law, 42, 371-374.
Itchenko, H. M., & Zhornokuy, Y. M. (2024). Venture Investment in Innovative Activity: Civil-Law Aspect [PhD dissertation,
Kalenichenko, L. I. (2014). Legal Aspects of the Category Social Responsibility in the System of Social Sciences. Bicuk International Humanitarian University.
Kingwell, M. (2020). Are Sentient AIs Persons? In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI. Oxford University Press.
Kniepert, C. (2021). Die Rechtsfähigkeit autonomer Systeme (Legal Capacity of Autonomous Systems). JURA – Juristische Ausbildung, 43.
Kobets, P. N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: Contemporary Approaches to the Formation of the Conceptual Framework and Regulation of Legal Relations. Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute(5).
Księżak, P., & Wojtczak, S. (2023). Toward a Conceptual Network for the Private Law of Artificial Intelligence.
Morkhat, P. M. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Unit as an Electronic Person. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University(2).
Moustafa, F. R. (2024). Towards Recognition of the Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1).
Pagallo, U., & Vital, S. (2013). The Quest for the Legal Personhood of Robots. Ai & Society, 28.
Pietrzykowski, T. (2017). The Idea of Non-Personal Subjects of Law. In V. A. J. Kurki & T. Pietrzykowski (Eds.), Legal Personhood.
Rustamadze, A. K., & Mamedov, A. I. O. (2012). Consideration of Artificial Intelligence through the Prism of Legal Capacity. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 63.
Shcherbyna, B. S., & Tkachenko, V. V. (2021). Artificial Intelligence as a Subject of Civil Law. Legal Bulletin(1).
Smith, B. (1928). Legal Personality. Yale Law Journal, 37(3).
Varynskyi, V. O. (2024). Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence: A Critical View of Autonomy. Information and Law(4).
Yalman, B. (2024). Electronic Personhood: A Compact Analysis of Legal Personality for Artificial Intelligence. Ex/Ante(1), 3-13.
Yastrebov, O. A. (2018). Legal Personality of an Electronic Person: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13(2), 36-55.
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2020a). Strengthening Legal Protection against Discrimination by Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(10), 1572-1593.
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2020b). Strengthening Legal Protection against Discrimination by Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(10).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mansour Amini (Author); Sajjad Kalantarzadeh Sadabad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
