The Legal Consequences of Failing to Observe the Principal’s Interests by the Agent in Iranian Law, with Emphasis on Supreme Court’s Unified Ruling No. 847
Keywords:
Principal’s Interests, Iranian Law, Supreme Court Unified Ruling No. 847, Judicial PracticeAbstract
Matters related to representation, particularly in contractual representation such as agency agreements, hold significant importance due to the extensive scope of contractual discussions. This significance is further highlighted by the large number of legal disputes between lawyers and their principals, which underscores the issue. The obligation to act in the principal’s interests is generally addressed within the law; however, there is no precise standard or clear guideline to define the extent of this duty. This lack of clarity often leads to disagreements between agents and their principals regarding whether the agent has complied with this obligation, with the potential for harm to either party. Moreover, no specific legal remedy has been established for such violations. For example, in a case concerning the annulment of a document and declaring a transaction as being contrary to the best interests of the client, the Ninth Chamber of the Supreme Court, in Ruling No. 108/9, ruled in a case where the client filed a lawsuit against the agent for transferring a property at a price much lower than its real value, against the client’s interests. Although the power of attorney stipulated that the agent could transfer the subject matter at any price and in any manner deemed appropriate, the court, in overturning the appellate decision, stated: “The appeal’s reliance on the premise that determining the client’s best interests (as the power of attorney grants the agent discretion to act at any price and by any method deemed appropriate) is within the agent’s discretion, is neither justifiable nor reasonable. Accepting this position would contradict the provisions of Article 667 of the Civil Code, and its broad application would constitute an abuse of power, contrary to the latter part of the aforementioned article.” This study, through an analysis of the Civil Code, judicial practices, and reliance on the Supreme Court’s recent Unified Ruling No. 847, demonstrates that agents are legally bound to fully safeguard the best interests of the principal. However, variations in the scope of authority granted to agents, the nature of representation, and the interpretation of the agents’ duties can lead to differences in how this obligation is applied.
References
Allama Hilli, Hassan ibn Yusuf, Mukhtalif al-Shi’a fi Ahkam al-Shari’ah, 2nd Edition, Qom, Islamic Publishing Office, 1998.
Allama Hilli, Hassan ibn Yusuf, Tadhkira al-Fuqaha (Old Edition), First Edition, Qom, Al-Bait Institute for the Preservation of Heritage, 1993.
Allama Hilli, Hassan ibn Yusuf, Tahrir al-Ahkam ala Madhhab al-Imamiyyah, First Edition, Mashhad, Al-Bait Institute for the Preservation of Heritage, Volume 2, No Date.
Bahrani, Yusuf ibn Ahmad, Al-Hada’iq al-Nadhira fi Ahkam al-‘Itrah al-Tahira, First Edition, Qom, Islamic Publishing Office, Volume 23, 1987.
Bojnordi, Seyed Mohammad Hassan, Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyyah, Volume 2, Qom, Al-Hadi Publishing, 1999.
Estaji Darini, Ali Akbar, “The Concept and Juridical Position of Expediency”, Strategic Legal Journal, Issue 19, Tehran, 2001.
Haji Azizi, Bijan, Etemad, Maryam, “The Legal Consequences of Failing to Observe Expediency in Agency”, Fiqh and Usul Journal, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2015.
Hilli, Muhammad ibn Hassan, Izzah al-Fawa’id fi Sharh Mushkilat al-Qawa’id, First Edition, Qom, Ismailian Publishing, Volume 3, 1967.
Hor ‘Ameli, Muhammad ibn Hassan, Tafseel Wasail al-Shi’a ila Tohsil Masa’il al-Shari’ah, First Edition, Qom, Al-Bait Institute for the Preservation of Heritage, Volume 20, 1988.
Ibn Idris al-Hilli, Muhammad ibn Mansour, Al-Sara’ir al-Hawi li-Tahreer al-Fatawi, 2nd Edition, Qom, Volume 2, Islamic Publishing Office, 1999.
Isfahani, Seyed Abolhassan, Mousavi Khomeini, Seyed Ruhollah, Vasilat al-Najah with Commentary by Imam Khomeini, First Edition, Qom, Institute for the Publication and Organization of Imam Khomeini’s Works, 2001.
Katouzian, Nasser, Mu’ayyan Contracts, Volume 4, 7th Edition, Tehran, Samt Publishing Company, 2013.
Khwansari, Seyed Ahmad ibn Yusuf, Jami’ al-Madarik fi Sharh al-Mukhtasar al-Nafi’, 2nd Edition, Qom, Ismailian Institute, 1985.
Khoei, Seyed Abu al-Qasim, edited by: Toheedi, Mohammad Ali, Misbah al-Fiqhah (al-Makasib), First Edition, Qom, Al-Fiqhah Publishing, Volume 5, 1999.
Mousavi Khomeini, Seyed Ruhollah, Tahrir al-Wasilah, First Edition, Qom, Dar al-Ilm, Volume 2, 1989.
Muqaddas Ardebili, Ahmad ibn Muhammad, Zubdat al-Bayan fi Ahkam al-Qur’an, First Edition, Tehran, Al-Maktabah al-Murtazawiyyah Publishing, No Date.
Safai, Seyed Hossein and Imami, Asadollah, Family Law: Marriage and Its Dissolution, Volume 1, 7th Edition, Tehran, Tehran University Press, 1999.
Safai, Seyed Hossein, Qasimzadeh, Seyed Morteza, Civil Rights of Persons and Incompetents, 35th Edition, Tehran, Samt Publishing, 2024.
Shaheed Thani, Zayn al-Din ibn Ali, Al-Rawdah al-Bahiyyah fi Sharh al-Lama’ah al-Dimashqiyyah, First Edition, Qom, Da’uri Library Publishing, Volume 5, 1989.
Sheikh Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hassan, Al-Mabsut fi Fiqh al-Imamiyyah, 3rd Edition, Tehran, Al-Maktabah al-Murtazawiyyah Publishing, Volume 2, 1967.
Sheikh Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hassan, Al-Tibyan fi Tafseer al-Qur’an, First Edition, Beirut, Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-Arabi, No Date.
Sheikh Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hassan, Tahdhib al-Ahkam, 4th Edition, Tehran, Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah Publishing, Volume 7, 1985.
Tayyeb, Seyed Abd al-Hossein, Atayeb al-Bayan fi Tafseer al-Qur’an, 2nd Edition, Tehran, Islam Publishing, 1999.
