Safeguarding Citizens’ Constitutional Rights through the Balance of Powers: An Analysis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights

Authors

Keywords:

European Convention on Human Rights, constitutional rights, balance of powers, separation of powers, rule of law, judicial independence, European Court of Human Rights, subsidiarity, proportionality

Abstract

The protection of constitutional rights requires more than their formal recognition in domestic constitutions and international human rights instruments; it also depends on institutional arrangements capable of preventing the concentration and arbitrary exercise of public power. This article examines the role of the balance of powers in safeguarding citizens’ constitutional rights within the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights. It focuses on the relationship between the separation of powers, the rule of law, judicial independence, judicial supervision, subsidiarity, the margin of appreciation, and proportionality. The analysis shows that the Convention system establishes a multilevel structure of rights protection in which national institutions retain primary responsibility for securing fundamental rights, while the European Court of Human Rights provides subsidiary supervision when domestic mechanisms fail to offer adequate protection. Particular attention is given to the role of independent courts in controlling legislative and executive action and to the importance of proportionality in balancing individual rights against legitimate public interests. The article also examines the manner in which subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation preserve national constitutional autonomy while maintaining minimum European standards of protection. It argues that the effectiveness of the Convention depends on maintaining an appropriate equilibrium between national discretion and European judicial control. This equilibrium is particularly important in relation to the right to liberty and security, the right to a fair trial, freedom of expression, and the right to privacy. The findings indicate that the balance of powers should be understood not merely as an organizational principle of constitutional government, but as a substantive mechanism for protecting individuals against arbitrary state action. Strengthening judicial independence, effective domestic remedies, and compliance with European Court judgments remains essential for ensuring sustainable protection of constitutional rights.

References

Abu Al-Wafa, A. (2008). International protection of human rights within the framework of the United Nations and specialized international agencies (3 ed.).

Abu, H. (1999). Wars and the balance of power: A comprehensive study of the theory of the balance of power and its dialectical relationship with war and peace (1 ed.). Al-Ahliyyah Publishing.

Al-Barai, E. S. (1985). The protection of human rights under the regional international organization (1 ed.).

Al-Fatlawi, S. H. (2007). Human rights (1 ed.). Dar Al-Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution.

Al-Harf, T. (1980). Public freedoms.

Al-Hawari, A. M. (2009). The new European Court of Human Rights: A study in light of the European Convention on Human Rights and its amending protocols (1 ed.). Legal Library.

Al-Midani, M. A. (2009). The European system for the protection of human rights (3 ed.). Halabi Legal Publications.

Al-Rashidi, A. (2005). Human rights: A comparative study in theory and practice. International Al-Shorouk Library.

Asfour, M. (1961). The rule of law: The conflict between law and authority in the East and the West.

Attia, N. (1989). The constitutional philosophy of public freedoms. Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya.

Bashir, A.-S. M. (2007). Human rights law: Its sources and national and international applications (4 ed.). Mansha'at Al-Ma'arif.

Bassiouni, M. C., & Mohieddin, K. (2007). International and regional criminal justice instruments, Part I: International and regional instruments (Vol. 1). Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya.

Christoffersen, J. (2009). Fair balance: Proportionality, subsidiarity and primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Vol. 99). Brill.

De Vries, S. A. (2013). Balancing fundamental rights with economic freedoms according to the European Court of Justice.

Docksey, C. (2016). Four fundamental rights: Finding the balance. International Data Privacy Law, 6(3), 195-209.

Jaffal, Z. M. S. (2016). Al-Wafi in human rights law. Al-Afaq Al-Mushriqah Publishers.

Khalifa, A. K. A. (2009). International human rights law. Dar Al-Jami'a Al-Jadida.

Marks, S. (1996). The European Convention on Human Rights and its democratic society. The British Year Book of International Law, 66(1), 209.

Metwally, A. H. (1977). Public freedoms.

Ní Aoláin, F. (1995). The emergence of diversity: Differences in human rights jurisprudence. Fordham International Law Journal, 19, 101.

Pentassuglia, G. (2002). Minorities in international law: An introductory study (Vol. 1). Council of Europe.

Rosas, A. (2014). Balancing fundamental rights in EU law. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 16, 347-360.

Sacerdoti, G. (2002). The European Charter of Fundamental Rights: From a Nation-State Europe to a Citizens' Europe. Columbia Journal of European Law, 8, 37.

Saudi, O. (2018). The promotion and protection of human rights. State Information Service.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

How to Cite

Dabirnia, A., & Kadhim Oudah, M. . (2026). Safeguarding Citizens’ Constitutional Rights through the Balance of Powers: An Analysis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 5(3), 1-17. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/539