The Future of the Robot Judge in Iran’s Judicial System: From Imagination to Legal Reality
Keywords:
Robot judge, artificial intelligence, fair trial, Iranian law, judicial ethics, legal technologiesAbstract
The rapid growth of emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, has brought concepts such as the "robot judge" from the realm of imagination into the domain of serious scientific and legal discourse. The idea of replacing or complementing human judges with robots—aimed at increasing the speed, accuracy, and impartiality of judicial proceedings—has attracted the attention of many legal systems around the world. Simultaneously, this transformation raises profound legal, ethical, and cultural challenges, especially in systems based on Islamic law and traditional judicial principles. In this context, examining the feasibility of implementing a robot judge within Iran’s judicial system—founded on the principles of fair trial, human dignity, and jurisprudential foundations—seems to be an inevitable necessity. The objective of this study is to analyze the legal, jurisprudential, and practical dimensions of incorporating a robot judge into the Iranian adjudicative process, while exploring the potential opportunities and threats posed by this technology. The central research question of the article is: "Given the legal framework, the requirements of fair trial, and the jurisprudential foundations present in Iran, to what extent is the realization of a robot judge feasible and justifiable?" The research method employed in this article is descriptive–analytical, utilizing library sources and a comparative review of the experiences of select countries in implementing artificial intelligence within their judicial systems. The findings of this study indicate that although AI-based tools used to assist judicial decision-making or predict judicial outcomes may be beneficial and justifiable in certain areas, the complete replacement of a human judge with a robot judge faces serious legal and jurisprudential barriers due to the necessity of exercising reason, fairness, ethical responsibility, and attention to human dignity. Under the current conditions of Iran’s judicial system, such replacement lacks full legal legitimacy.
References
Al-Mahrouqi, A. D., & Mayada, M. (2024). The Robot Judge and the Development of Justice Systems Towards Algorithms. Journal of Legal and Economic Research (Mansoura), 14(0), 1185-1257. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjle.2024.386613
Chau, M. (2024). Ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in Australian healthcare and ethical integration in radiography: A narrative review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 55(4), 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101733
Colther, C., & Doussoulin, J. P. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Driving force in the evolution of human knowledge. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100625
Gholizadeh, M., Soltani, A., & Ghabouli Derafshan, M. H. (2023). Judicial Independence in the Iranian Legal System; A Reflection on Historical Developments from the Constitutional Period to the Constitution (With Emphasis on the Hiring and Selection Stage). Scientific Quarterly Journal of New Research in Administrative Law, 5(16), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.22034/mral.2023.561719.1378
Giacalone, M., & Salehi, S. (2022). Small claims and the pursuit of (digital) justice: a tiered online dispute resolution perspective. Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho procesal(1), 181-213. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/859
Hajiloo, A. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Process: A Comparison of the Use of Intelligent Legal Systems in Iran and Developed Countries. Law and Political Science, 1(2), 108-114.
Kerdvibulvech, C. (2024). Big data and AI-driven evidence analysis: a global perspective on citation trends, accessibility, and future research in legal applications. Journal of Big Data, 11(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-01046-w
Khomeini, R. (2006). Translation of Tahrir al-Wasilah by Imam Khomeini (Vol. Two). Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.
Mostafavi Ardabili, S. M. M., Taghizadeh Ansari, M., & Rahmati Far, S. (2022). Functions and Requirements of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Fair Adjudication. Law of New Technologies, 3(6), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.22133/mtlj.2022.360802.1121
Murphy, R. R., & Woods, D. D. (2020). Beyond Asimov: The three laws of responsible roboticsBT - Machine ethics and robot ethics. In (pp. 405-411). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074991-35
Rafiq, J. (2024). Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Indian Justice System: An Empirical Study. National Journal of Cyber Security Law, 7(1), 18-37.
Roberts, H., Babuta, A., Morley, J., Thomas, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence regulation in the United Kingdom: a path to good governance and global leadership? Internet Policy Review, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.2.1709
Sung, H. C. (2020). Can online courts promote access to justice? A case study of the Internet courts in China. Computer Law & Security Review, 39, 105461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105461
Vlahou, A., Hallinan, D., Apweiler, R., Argiles, A., Beige, J., & Benigni, A. (2021). Data sharing under the general data protection regulation: time to harmonize law and research ethics? Hypertension, 77(4), 1029-1035. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16340
Wang, L. (2024). Application of information technology in judicial field: The development model of online litigation in China. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105936
Ward, J. (2021). Black Box Artificial Intelligence and the Rule of Law. Law & Contemp. Probs., 84(i).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Seyyed Esmail Karimi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
