Analyzing Modern Approaches to Restorative Justice in Addressing Violent Crimes

Abstract

David Matza’s criminological framework—particularly his concepts of drift and techniques of neutralization—offers a robust analytical lens for understanding how otherwise law-abiding individuals engage in criminal behavior under specific situational pressures while still perceiving themselves as morally compliant. This article examines Matza’s foundational theoretical contributions, elucidating how individuals “drift” between conformity and deviance and employ rationalizing mechanisms to justify prohibited conduct. The discussion then links these concepts to situational crime prevention (SCP), an applied crime-reduction paradigm that focuses on altering environmental conditions to limit criminal opportunities. Through a review of the scholarly literature, we demonstrate that Matza’s emphasis on moral constraints and justificatory narratives aligns closely with SCP’s principle of removing excuses, a strategy designed to counteract the very rationalizations Matza identified (e.g., the denial of injury or the denial of responsibility). Real-world illustrations, including instances of theft and vandalism, are used to highlight these conceptual intersections. We further argue that incorporating an understanding of neutralization techniques into preventive strategies strengthens both the theoretical foundation and practical effectiveness of SCP. Drawing on both classic works and contemporary research, the article concludes that integrating Matza’s insights enhances the explanatory depth and design of situational interventions.