Comparative Study of Criminal Protection of Digital Assets in the Metaverse in the European Union and Japan
Keywords:
Digital assets, metaverse, criminal protection, European Union, Japan, Iran, cybercrimeAbstract
With the increasing expansion of emerging technologies and the advent of complex virtual environments such as the metaverse, digital assets have become one of the most significant forms of property within emerging platforms. This transformation has confronted criminal justice systems with novel challenges. The principal issue of this study is how digital assets in the metaverse can be protected against criminal threats and what similarities and differences exist between the approaches adopted by the European Union and Japan in this regard. The aim of this research is to conduct a comparative examination of the criminal protection of digital assets in the metaverse within two leading legal systems, namely the European Union and Japan, and to propose models for the Iranian legal system, which has thus far lacked a coherent framework in this field. The necessity of this research lies in the increasing growth of metaverse-related crimes, the inadequacy of victim protection, and the legislative vacuum within the Iranian legal system. The main research question is: “How do the criminal justice systems of the European Union and Japan protect digital assets in the metaverse, and what models can be extracted for the reform of criminal legislation in Iran?” The findings of the study indicate that Japan, through reliance on specific legislation concerning crypto-assets and newly enacted criminal regulations, and the European Union, through the adoption of innovative legal frameworks such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, are advancing effective criminal protection of digital assets. In conclusion, the study emphasizes the necessity of reforming Iranian criminal laws, particularly in the fields of cybercrime and digital property. This research was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method with a comparative approach.
References
Andrade, B. D., Poplin, A., & Sena, I. S. D. (2020). Minecraft as a tool for engaging children in urban planning: A case study in Tirol Town, Brazil. Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 9, 170.
Avci, G., & Erzurumlu, Y. O. (2023). Blockchain tokenization of real estate investment: A security token offering procedure and legal design proposal. Journal of Property Research, 40, 188-207.
Ayoubi, S. (2024). Transformation of Attitudes toward Property in the Digital Context [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mazandaran]. Mazandaran.
Balis, J. (2022). How brands can enter the metaverse. https://hbr.org/2022/01/how-brands-can-enter-the-metaverse
Burilov, V. (2019). Regulation of crypto tokens and initial coin offerings in the EU. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 6, 146-186.
Chiu, I. H. Y., & Greene, E. F. (2019). The marriage of technology, markets and sustainable (and) social finance: Insights from ICO markets for a new regulatory framework. European Business Organization Law Review, 20, 139-169.
Cotter, K., Crone, D., Rodriguez-Boerwinkle, R., Boerwinkle, M., Silvia, P., & Pawelski, J. (2022). Examining the flourishing impacts of repeated visits to a virtual art museum and the role of immersion. Behavioral Sciences, 12, 500.
Damodaran, A. (2022). From non-fungible tokens to metaverse: Blockchain-based inclusive innovation in arts. Innovation and Development, 1-20.
Esmaeili, M., & Ghavi al-Bonieh, A. (2022). Reconsideration of the Rules Related to Public Property Based on the Transformation of the Theory of Private Ownership. Justice Law Journal, 86(120), 179-199.
European Banking Authority. (2013). Warning to Consumers on Virtual Currencies (EBA/WRG/2013/01). https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/10180/598344/b99b0dd0-f253-47ee-82a5-c547e408948c/EBA%20Warning%20on%20Virtual%20Currencies.pdf
European Commission. (2017). Report on the Assessment of the Risks of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Affecting the Internal Market and Relating to Cross-Border Activities. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0340
European Commission. (2018). FinTech Action Plan: For a More Competitive and Innovative European Financial Sector. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0109
European Parliament. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on Markets in Crypto-assets. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02023R1114-20240109
Fairfield, J. A. (2022). Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Indiana Law Journal, 97, 1261.
Fujiwara, B. (2023). A Study on Non-Performing Assets Cases and Cryptocurrency in Japan. City University of Hong Kong.
Gan, J., Tsoukalas, G., & Serguei, N. (2020). Initial coin offerings, speculation, and asset tokenization. Management Science, 67, 914-931.
Garcia-Teruel, R. M., & Simon-Moreno, H. (2021). The digital tokenization of property rights: A comparative perspective. Computer Law and Security Review, 41, 1-16.
Giannini, T., & Bowen, J. P. (2023). Global cultural conflict and digital identity: Transforming museums. Heritage, 6, 1986-2005.
Han, J., Liu, G., & Gao, Y. (2023). Learners in the metaverse: A systematic review on the use of Roblox in learning. Learning in the Metaverse, 12, 296.
Kalpokas, I., & Kalpokiene, J. (2023). Regulating the Metaverse. Routledge Taylor and Francis.
Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., & Petrescu, F. I. T. (2023). Three-dimensional printing and 3D scanning: Emerging technologies exhibiting high potential in the field of cultural heritage. Applied Sciences, 13, 4777.
Kayani, U., & Hasan, F. (2024). Unveiling cryptocurrency impact on financial markets and traditional banking systems: Lessons for sustainable blockchain and interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17, 58.
Kiskis, M. (2024). Private law framework for blockchain. Frontiers in Blockchain, 7, 1205461.
Li, T., Liu, J., & Xu, Y. (2022). Simulation research and development of new marine simulator based on Videotrace. In Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computer Simulation (pp. 58-64). IOS Press.
Lozano-Duran, A., Rudolphi-Solero, T., Nava-Baro, E., Ruiz-Gomez, M., & Sendra-Portero, F. (2023). Training scientific communication skills on medical imaging within the virtual world Second Life. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20, 1697.
Mojahed, M., Rajabzadeh, A., & Elahi, M. (2024). Examining the Legitimacy of Virtual Assets with Emphasis on Digital Currency (Cryptocurrency). Law and Political Science, 5(2), 1-16.
Pundziene, A., & Gadeikiene, A. (2023). Digital ecosystems for sustainable society: Current developments and future research pathways. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship (ICTE), Kaunas, Lithuania.
Shen, J., Zhou, X., Wu, W., Wang, L., & Chen, Z. (2023). Worldwide overview and country differences in metaverse research: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15, 3541.
Sheng, B., Zhang, C., Yin, X., Lu, Q., Cheng, Y., Xiao, T., & Liu, H. (2016). Common intelligent semantic matching engines of cloud manufacturing service based on OWL-S. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84, 103-118.
Swinkels, L. (2023). Empirical evidence on the ownership and liquidity of real estate tokens. Financial Innovation, 9, 45.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rasool Moradi Emamgheisi (Author); Yasin Saeedi; Razie Ghasemi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.