Analysis of the Relationship Between Justice and Contract Law

Authors

    Sima Esmailpour PhD student in Private Law, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
    Yousef Molaei * Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran yousefmolaei2024@gmail.com
    Mehdi Sheidaei Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Justice, as one of the fundamental principles of law, plays a key role in regulating social relations and achieving fairness in society. Contract law, as one of the essential legal instruments, is designed to regulate and uphold obligations between individuals. This study examines the relationship between justice and contract law and seeks to demonstrate how the principles of justice can influence the drafting, interpretation, and enforcement of contracts. The findings indicate that justice is not only a moral foundation but also a practical criterion that can enhance the function of contract law and prevent the misuse of contractual power and other common injustices. The fundamental question is how justice principles can be applied in contract law in a way that promotes fairness and transparency in commercial relationships while also preventing exploitation and abuse. This issue also involves analyzing the mechanisms and legal instruments that the judiciary and regulatory institutions can use to ensure justice in contracts. Furthermore, the economic and social impacts of adhering to justice in contract law must be examined. The proper implementation of justice principles can be a crucial factor in strengthening public trust, reducing unnecessary legal disputes, and increasing the efficiency and transparency of economic systems. This research aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the role and impact of justice in contracts by studying various societies and legal systems and to propose practical solutions for improving the current situation. The objective is to utilize the findings and experiences gained to develop more effective policies and legal frameworks in the field of contract law.

References

Abdo, M. (2002). Consumer Protection in Islamic Economic Jurisprudence. Dar Majdalawi.

Amini, M., & Abedian, M. H. (2012). How Legal Systems Deal with Unfair Contract Terms and the Silence of the Consumer Rights Protection Law in Iran. Journal of Legal Research, 15(59), 22-40.

Badini, H. (2016). Philosophy of Tort Liability. Enteshar Co.

Bagheri Asl, H. (2011). General Provisions for the Termination of Binding Contracts. Tabriz University Publications.

Bagheri, M., & Fazli, M. (2013). Consumer Protection in Insurance Contracts Based on Commutative Justice. Majlis and Strategy Quarterly, 20(74), 111-139.

Benetti Timm, L. (2008). The social function of contract law in Brazilian Civil Code: distributive justice versus efficiency - lessons from the United States. Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, UC Berkeley.

Catherine, M. (2022). Future Challenges for Contract Law. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-contract-law/article/future-challenges-for-contract-law/39F5A23A2F4B2B4D4C62B8E4E21B6D3B

Collins, H. (1992). Social Market and the Law of Contract. Franz Steiner Verlag.

Hatami, A. A., Sadeghi, & Abdolreza. (2012). Unfair Penalty Clause. Journal of Legal Knowledge and Research Quarterly, 1(2), 30-44.

Hesselink, M. W. (2008). CFR & Social Justice. Working Paper Series.

Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2014). Theory of Balance. Ganj Danesh Publications.

Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (2006). Fairness versus Human Welfare. Harvard University Press.

Katouzian, N. (2009a). Introduction to the Science of Law. Enteshar Co.

Katouzian, N. (2009b). Philosophy of Law (Vol. 1). Enteshar Co.

Khakbaz, M. (2014). Commutative Justice in Positive Law and Judicial Procedure. Hoghoog Emrooz Publications.

Knights, D., & Wilmot, H. (2007). Introducing Organizational Behavior and Management. Thomson.

Kronman, A. T. (1980). Contract Law and Distributive Justice. Yale Law Journal, 89, 473. https://doi.org/10.2307/795892

Marelia, M. R. (2006). The Old and the New Limits to Freedom of Contract in Europe. European Review Contract law, 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/ERCL.2006.019

Milani, S. M., Amini, M., & Akefi, V. (2024). Failure of Contract Purpose in Islamic and Iranian Law: A Comparative Study with English Law. Journal of Islamic Law, 21.

Mohaghegh Damad, S. M. (2014). Rules of Jurisprudence. Center for Islamic Sciences Publishing.

Motameni Tabatabaei, M. (2011). Administrative Law. SAMT Publications.

Nasiri, M. (2005). Comparative Study of the Right of Suspension and the Right of Retention in Domestic Law and the FIDIC Sample Contract. Modares Journal of Humanities, 12(4), 20-23.

Parvin, F., & Akbari Roodposhti, A. (2013). A Comparative Approach in the Law Governing Contracts. Journal of Justice Law, 82.

Raei, M., & Molaeian, M. (2014). The Approach of Imami Jurisprudence to Commutative Justice and Its Impact on Contracts of Adhesion. Islamic Law Quarterly, 40.

Sajjadi, S. A. (2006). The Principle of Legality of Crimes and Punishments. Specialized Journal of Theology, 2-10.

Wilhelmsson, T. (1992). Critical Studies in Private Law: Treaties on Need- Rational Principles in Modern Law. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8028-1

Wilhelmsson, T. (2004). Varieties of Welfarism in European Contract law. European Law Journal, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00240.x

Yousefzadeh, A. (2023). The Position and Examples of Restorative Justice in Contract Law A Comparative Study in Common Law and Iranian Law. 12(24), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v1i1.13

Zanjani, A. (1991). Contract Law in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law. Journal of International Law, 14.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

Submitted

2024-07-24

Revised

2024-10-21

Accepted

2024-11-05

How to Cite

Esmailpour, S., Molaei, Y. ., & Sheidaei, M. . (2024). Analysis of the Relationship Between Justice and Contract Law. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 3(4), 36-48. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/86