Current Issue
				Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Serial Number 12
			
			
 	
				
					Published:
				
				
					2025-09-26
				
			
			This article examines Iran’s legislative criminal policy in the fields of transport, urban development, and land management, with particular emphasis on its preventive and regulatory dimensions. It explores how fragmented and reactive legislation has limited the effectiveness of crime prevention in key sectors such as intercity road safety, illegal construction, and land grabbing. The study identifies major gaps in legal coherence, enforcement capacity, and institutional coordination, while highlighting areas of progress such as the 2013 Comprehensive Cadastre Law and the integration of digital monitoring systems. By analyzing the theoretical foundations, historical evolution, and practical implications of Iran’s legislative criminal policy, the article argues that modernization requires a shift from punitive deterrence to proactive prevention. Technological instruments such as smart surveillance, GPS tracking, and big data analytics offer promising tools for reducing crime and improving transparency, but their success depends on clear legal frameworks governing privacy, accountability, and data governance. The findings emphasize the need for comprehensive codification of criminal provisions, the adoption of restorative and alternative sanctions, and the strengthening of inter-institutional collaboration among legislative, judicial, and executive bodies. The article concludes that Iran’s criminal policy can achieve greater coherence and public trust by embracing integrated governance, preventive technology, and principled legislative reform aligned with international standards of legality, proportionality, and justice.
A partnership agreement is a contract in which two or more individuals agree to share their financial resources, expertise, and responsibilities to initiate or continue a joint business venture. In this type of contract, each partner is committed to their respective share of the profits and losses of the business and jointly assumes management and decision-making responsibilities. Under Iranian law, partnerships can take various forms, such as civil partnerships and commercial partnerships, each of which is subject to specific legal provisions. In this context, the sharing economy, as a manifestation of transformation in the contemporary economic system, has provided a framework in which natural persons deliver goods and services through digital platforms. These developments have challenged the traditional structuring of contractual relationships and require reconsideration within existing legal frameworks. One of the most significant manifestations of this transformation is the formation of decentralized distribution networks and novel contracts characterized by reciprocity, vertical structure, adhesion, and, in some cases, exclusivity. This article adopts a descriptive approach to examine the legal principles governing partnership agreements.
The metaverse, as a three-dimensional and interactive virtual environment, has created a remarkable transformation in digital technologies and provided a platform for economic, social, and cultural activities. With the expansion of this space, the issue of intellectual property rights and the civil liability arising from their infringement has become one of the major legal challenges. This article examines the foundations of civil liability in the metaverse and compares them with existing legal principles to analyze how intellectual property laws and compensation mechanisms can be applied within this environment. The findings of the study indicate that the decentralized, transnational, and anonymous nature of users in the metaverse makes it difficult to pursue intellectual property violations. Intellectual property rights in the metaverse encompass copyright, trademarks, patents, and industrial designs, all of which can be easily infringed due to the rapid copyability and modifiability of digital content. The main challenges in this regard include a lack of legal transparency, difficulty in identifying offenders, determining judicial jurisdiction in cross-border contexts, and the liability of hosting platforms. To address these challenges, several solutions are proposed, including the development of specific metaverse regulations, the use of blockchain technology for registering ownership of digital works, the establishment of artificial intelligence–based monitoring systems, and user education programs.
Property rights constitute one of the fundamental pillars of legal and economic systems, exerting a direct impact on economic growth, investment attraction, and sustainable development. This study examines the status of property rights in Iran by analyzing its position in the International Property Rights Index (IPRI) and providing a comparative evaluation with both developed and peer countries. The findings reveal that Iran does not occupy a favorable position in this index, and factors such as weak enforcement of laws, lack of transparency, administrative corruption, and excessive government intervention have hindered improvements in the protection of property rights within the country. An examination of other countries’ experiences indicates that legal reforms, enhancement of the legal environment, and greater protection of intellectual and physical property rights can significantly improve the IPRI score and increase investment security. Accordingly, the study proposes measures including reforming related laws and institutions, strengthening transparency and reducing corruption, and enhancing the roles of both government and the private sector in safeguarding property rights. Implementing these strategies can improve Iran’s standing in the IPRI index, stimulate domestic and foreign investment, and ultimately foster sustainable economic growth.
According to Article 1 of the Civil Liability Law, anyone who, without legal authorization, intentionally or through negligence, causes harm to the life, health, property, freedom, dignity, commercial reputation, or any other legally recognized right of another person, resulting in material or moral damage, is liable to compensate for the loss arising from their action. The idea of establishing a specific compensation system for damages occurring in hospitals and clinics emerged when the solutions proposed by legal doctrines and judicial precedents for compensating such damages failed to resolve the issue completely. Today, medical service insurance policies in developed countries have become increasingly specialized, and insurance companies cover only those losses explicitly stated in the policy. Medical professionals, therefore, are often required to obtain multiple liability insurance policies to achieve comprehensive coverage of their professional responsibilities. This review article attempts to address issues related to nurses’ professional negligence, professional liability insurance, and its objectives and barriers. The research method is based on a library study and searches conducted on databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and SID, using keywords including professional liability insurance, nursing negligence, and objectives of liability insurance. The findings of the study indicate that the occurrence of errors in healthcare systems is inevitable. Despite significant scientific advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic services, the rate of malpractice complaints continues to rise. Therefore, acquiring precise knowledge about nursing liability is essential for reducing patient damages and enhancing the sense of security among healthcare personnel.
In recent years, the principles of administrative justice have undergone fundamental transformations in the judicial practice of the Administrative Justice Court—developments that have directly influenced the determination of the Court’s jurisdictional boundaries and the procedures for handling administrative disputes. The purpose of this study is to critically examine the process of formation and evolution of these boundaries, with particular emphasis on emerging principles of administrative justice, in order to identify existing deficiencies and propose solutions aimed at enhancing the Court’s performance and procedural efficiency. The research employs a descriptive–analytical method, and data were primarily gathered through document analysis, review of significant judicial decisions, comparative examination of procedural trends, and consultation of authoritative legal sources. The findings indicate that, despite the relative expansion of the Court’s jurisdiction in accordance with new standards of administrative justice, ambiguities and weaknesses remain in defining the limits of jurisdiction, recognizing individuals’ vested rights, and establishing effective compensation mechanisms. Drawing on the experience of advanced legal systems and implementing legislative reforms, the Court’s role in ensuring administrative justice can be strengthened and its efficiency improved.
The emergence of electronic contracts as an innovation within the digital economy has brought about a profound transformation in the methods of contract formation, execution, and supervision of legal obligations. This transformation—particularly in fields such as the oil and gas industry, which are intertwined with public resources, national rights, and international relations—necessitates new jurisprudential and legal considerations. The validity and legitimacy of electronic contracts in this domain, from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence, depend on the realization of conditions such as valid offer and acceptance, intent and consent, capacity of the parties, knowledge of the exchanged considerations, and the legitimacy of the contractual purpose—conditions that encounter specific challenges within the digital context. This study, employing a descriptive-analytical approach and based on jurisprudential and legal sources, examines these challenges in four main dimensions. Subsequently, by invoking jurisprudential principles such as sovereignty (salṭanat), validity (ṣiḥḥa), no harm (lā ḍarar), presumption of apparent meaning (ḥujjiyyat al-ẓāhir), and binding nature of conditions (al-mu’minūn ʿinda shurūṭihim), it proposes ijtihādī (interpretative) solutions to establish the credibility of such contracts. The findings reveal that Imami jurisprudence, by utilizing its methodological flexibility and the capacities of governmental jurisprudence, is capable of adapting to modern contractual frameworks, provided that the essential elements of the contract are properly fulfilled within technological environments and that religious and governmental oversight over the protection of public interests is continuously maintained.
The benevolent sale (Bayʿ al-Muḥābātī) is one of the forms of sale contracts recognized in Islamic jurisprudence and civil law, in which the seller transfers a commodity or property to the buyer at a price significantly lower than its real or customary market value. In such transactions, the seller’s intention is often driven more by affection, personal attachment, or non-financial considerations than by commercial motives. This type of sale commonly occurs within familial or friendly relationships and may serve purposes such as support, concealed donation, or the transfer of property while avoiding taxation or formal procedures. From a legal perspective, a benevolent sale is regarded as a valid contract of sale, provided that the essential conditions of contractual validity—such as intention, consent, legal capacity, and the specification and lawfulness of the subject matter—are fulfilled. Nevertheless, in cases where the benevolent nature of the transaction results in harm to third parties or the infringement of others’ rights, such as issues concerning heirs, fictitious transactions, or fraudulent conveyance to evade debts, the transaction may be subject to legal challenge. In the Iranian legal system, identifying and thoroughly analyzing benevolent sales is of great significance from legal, fiscal, and judicial perspectives.
 
        
    Number of Volumes
3
Number of Issues
9
Acceptance Rate
29%