Transformation in the Approach of the International Court of Justice from Legality to Legitimacy in the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons
Keywords:
Rule of law, International Court of Justice, nuclear weapons, legality, legitimacyAbstract
The advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the legitimacy of nuclear weapons created a fundamental shift in international legal reasoning, moving from a formalistic emphasis on legality to an essentialist focus on legitimacy. This article examines how the ICJ integrates broader humanitarian and environmental considerations into its interpretation of international law, particularly through the right to life, the prohibition of indiscriminate attacks, and the preservation of the environment. This shift reflects an emerging trend in the philosophy of international law that prioritizes collective human and environmental welfare over rigid state sovereignty. Key findings highlight the ICJ’s acknowledgment of the catastrophic consequences of nuclear weapons for both humanity and the environment. While the Court refrained from explicitly declaring nuclear weapons illegal, it established fundamental principles underscoring their incompatibility with humanitarian law and environmental protection. This transformation represents a broader movement in international law toward incorporating human rights and sustainability into the framework of state conduct. The study concludes by considering the implications of the ICJ’s approach for contemporary issues such as disarmament, environmental treaties, and the evolving concept of state responsibility in a globalized legal order.
References
Aghalar, A.-A., & Raei, M. (2022). The Prohibition of the Use of Biological Weapons from the Perspective of International Criminal Law and Islam. Criminal Law Teachings, 19(23), 32-33.
Arévalo-Ramírez, W. (2022). The International Court of Justice and The International Humanitarian Law Rules for Armed Conflicts. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 20(38), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.912
Bothe, M. (2016). Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinions.
Collier, J., & Lowe, V. (1999). The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198256694.001.0001
D'Argent, P. (2019). Article 65, In Andreas Zimmermann and Christian Tams. The Statute of The International Court of Justice (Vol. 1783). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198814894.003.0081
Doswald-Beck, L. (2010). International Humanitarian Law and The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of The Threat or Use Of Nuclear Weapons. International Review of the Red Cross, 37(316), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400084291
Ginsburg, T. (2021). The Institutional Context of the International Court of Justice. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3818915
Hernández, G. (2014). The International Court of Justice and The Judicial Function. The International Court of Justice and The Judicial Function, 23(4), 580-596. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646630.001.0001
Hilpold, P. (2023). The Ukraine Crisis, The Nuclear Threat and The ICJ Opinion of 1996. International Affairs, 14(2), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13201
Hofbauer, J. A. (2023). Not Just a Participation Trophy? Advancing Public Interests Through Advisory Opinions at The International Court of Justice. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 22(3), 234-272. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-bja10092
Mayr, T. F., & Mayr-Singer, J. (2016). Keep The Wheels Spinning: The Contributions of Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice to The Development of International Law. ZaöRV, 76(16), 425-449.
Meshkat, S. M., & Asgarkhani, A. M. (2019). Nuclear Extortion in the International Legal System with a Focus on the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 33(3), 20-21.
Milanović, M. (2009). A Norm Conflict Perspective on the Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 14(3), 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krp033
Nystuen, G., Casey-Maslen, S., & Golden Bersagel, A. (2014). Nuclear Weapons Under International Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337435
Omidi, A. (2013). A Legal Analysis of the Dimensions and Consequences of the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice Regarding the Declaration of Independence of Kosovo. Public Law Research Quarterly, 15(41), 45-49.
Park, L. (2018). The International Court and Rule-Making: Finding Effectiveness.
Shah-Hosseini, M. H. (2002). Defense Against Biological Warfare and Bioterrorism. Tehran: Research Organization of the Basij Resistance Forces.
Stavridi, M. (2024). The Advisory Function of the International Court of Justice: Are States Resorting to Advisory Proceedings as a "Soft" Litigation Strategy. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 22(4), 1-25.
