Civil Liability of Content Producers and Providers in Cyberspace
Keywords:
Civil liability, content, cyberspace, content producers and providersAbstract
Technological advancement has rendered the influence of cyberspace on human life undeniable, and its significance continues to increase daily. Content is the central element of cyberspace. The growing use of cyberspace, on one hand, and the potential ability of content to cause harm to individuals, on the other, have heightened the necessity for legislative attention to this domain. Given that the actors in cyberspace can be broadly categorized into two main groups—content producers and providers, and ordinary users—civil liability arising from the production and dissemination of defective content pertains primarily to the first group (i.e., producers and distributors of content). This is because ordinary users generally play no role in causing damage. However, in situations where an ordinary user could prevent the occurrence or expansion of damage but fails to do so, the resulting harm will not be compensable due to the absence of customary attribution of the damage to the producer or provider of content, as well as in light of the legal maxim of “act of intervention”. Furthermore, in cases where multiple producers and providers contribute to the production and distribution of defective content, liability for damages must be apportioned among them in accordance with the extent of their individual contributions.
References
Alsan, M. (2014). Cyber Space Law. Shahr-e-Danesh Publishing.
Badini, H. (2015). Philosophy of Civil Liability. Sherkat Sahami Enteshar.
Bert, J. K. (2012). Criminal law and Cyberspace as a Challenge for Legal Research. SCRIPTed, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.090312.354
Boiko. (2005). Content management bible. Wiley.
Convention on Cybercrime, Budapest, 23 November 2001, CETS 185. (2001).
Cutlip, S. M., Allen, H. C., & Glen, M. B. (2006). Effective public relations. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Dutch Supreme Court [Hoge Raad] 31 January 2012, LJN BQ9251, (2012).
Elkin Koren, N. (2006). Making technology Visible: liability of Internet Service Providers for Peer to Peer Traffic. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 9.
Katouzian, N. (2005). Non-Contractual Obligations: Tort Liability (Vol. 1). University of Tehran Press.
Khorsandian, M. A., & Sharai, E. (2016). The Rule of Non-Interference in the Scope of Islamic Private Law. Gostaresh Rayaneh.
Malekouti, R., & Saurabi, P. (2016). An Introduction to Civil Liability in Cyberspace. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research, 4(15).
Oxford Dictionary, Content. (2016). http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ content?q=content
Posner, E. A. (1998). Standards, Rules, and Social Norms. Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y, 21.
Rahpeyk, H. (2011). Civil Liability Law and Remedies. Khorsandi Publishing.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1962). The Social Contract. University of Tehran Press.
Smith, G. J. H. (2002). Internet Law and Regulation. Sweet and Maxwell.
Taylor, M. (2006). International Competition Law: A new pimension for the wto? university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494574
Zabarjad, S. F., & Khorsandian, M. A. (2023). A New Perspective on Economic Analysis of Law in Light of the Islamic Jurisprudential Rule of Non-Interference. Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Studies, 14(28).
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Sadeq Borzou (Author); Hekmatollah Askari; Zohreh Farrokhi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.