Legal Challenges of Deepfakes: Liability, Harm, and Regulatory Responses
Keywords:
Deepfakes, Synthetic Media, Intermediary Liability, Platform Governance, AI Regulation, Privacy, Defamation, Disinformation, Digital Policy, Content AuthenticityAbstract
Deepfake technologies have rapidly evolved from experimental artificial intelligence innovations into widely accessible tools capable of producing hyper-realistic synthetic media that blur the boundaries between truth and fabrication. Their ability to manipulate identity, falsify expressive acts, and fabricate audiovisual content presents unprecedented challenges for legal systems structured around assumptions of authenticity, traceability, and human agency. This narrative review synthesizes current scholarship and regulatory developments to examine the multifaceted harms associated with deepfakes, including reputational injury, privacy violations, political manipulation, economic fraud, and broader societal erosion of trust. These harms expose significant doctrinal gaps in defamation, privacy, tort, and criminal law, which struggle to account for the speed and anonymity of synthetic media production. The analysis further explores complexities within liability frameworks, focusing on creators, distributors, platforms, AI developers, and malicious users whose involvement complicates traditional models of responsibility. Platform governance, intermediary liability, and cross-border enforcement challenges reveal structural weaknesses in existing regulatory approaches. National, regional, and international responses—including criminal prohibitions, civil remedies, the EU Digital Services Act, and emerging AI governance initiatives—offer partial solutions, yet they remain fragmented and inconsistently enforced. Soft-law interventions, including platform policies, content labeling, and authenticity tools, provide additional layers of protection but lack uniformity and transparency. To move toward a coherent legal framework, this review highlights the need for harmonized standards integrating civil, criminal, technological, and administrative mechanisms. Proposed directions include duty-of-care obligations for AI developers and platforms, mandatory watermarking systems, cross-border cooperation tools, and experimental regulatory sandboxes. Overall, the study emphasizes that addressing deepfake risks requires an interdisciplinary approach combining technological safeguards, legal reform, and multi-stakeholder governance to preserve individual rights, societal trust, and democratic resilience in an era of increasingly sophisticated synthetic media.
References
Ali, A. H. S., Saidin, O. K., Roisah, K., & Ediwarman, E. (2021). Liability of Internet Intermediaries in Copyright Infringement: Comparison Between the United States and India. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2021.2312595
Dyson, M. R. (2022). Combatting AI’s Protectionism &Amp; Totalitarian-Coded Hypnosis: The Case for AI Reparations &Amp; Antitrust Remedies in the Ecology of Collective Self-Determination. Smu Law Review, 75(3), 625. https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.75.3.7
Gorwa, R. (2020). The State of Global Harmful Content Regulation: Empirical Observations. Aoir Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11221
Gorwa, R. (2021). Elections, Institutions, and the Regulatory Politics of Platform Governance: The Case of the German NetzDG. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2exrw
Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Siegel, A., Woolley, S., Fowler, E. F., Nielsen, R. K., Wittenberg, C., Fukuyama, F., Keller, D., Hwang, T., Gorwa, R., & Persily, N. (2020). Social Media and Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960
Hörnle, J. (2021). The Jurisdictional Challenge Answered—Enforcement Through Gatekeepers on the Internet. 33-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806929.003.0003
Kira, B., Tavengerwei, R., & Mumbo, V. (2022). Points À Examiner À l'Approche Des Négociations De Phase II De La ZLECAf: Enjeux De La Politique Commerciale Numérique Dans Quatre Pays d'Afrique Subsaharienne. https://doi.org/10.35489/bsg-dp-wp_2022/01
Machado, C., & Aguiar, T. H. (2023). Emerging Regulations on Content Moderation and Misinformation Policies of Online Media Platforms: Accommodating the Duty of Care Into Intermediary Liability Models. Business and Human Rights Journal, 8(2), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.25
Paglietti, M. C., & Rabitti, M. (2022). A Matter of Time. Digital-Financial Consumers’ Vulnerability in the Retail Payments Market. European Business Law Review, 33(Issue 4), 581-606. https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022027
Ray, A. (2021). Disinformation, Deepfakes and Democracies: The Need for Legislative Reform. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.53637/dels2700
Reich, R., Sahami, M., & Weinstein, J. M. (2022). System Error: Where Big Tech Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 74(1), 62-64. https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf3-22reich
Watney, M. (2022). Regulation of Social Media Intermediary Liability for Illegal and Harmful Content. European Conference on Social Media, 9(1), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecsm.9.1.104
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.