Analysis of Virtual World Elements with Emphasis on Property Rights

Authors

    Aref Shariat Kermani Department of Law, KI.C., Islamic Azad University, Hormozgan, Iran
    Moein Sabahi Garaghani * Department of Law, Ke.C., Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran moiensabahi@iauk.ac.ir
    Yaser Salari Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ke.C., Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.196

Keywords:

Virtual world, property rights, virtual objects, legislation

Abstract

In this research, a descriptive-analytical method has been employed to analyze the elements of the virtual world with an emphasis on property rights. The technological development of information and communication technology has brought numerous innovations that have not only optimized our tasks and activities but also enhanced human capacity to expand social relations across borders and in the international arena in this globalized and interconnected world. With millions of online players, persistent and durable computer-generated spaces and environments, known as virtual worlds, play a highly significant and effective role. On the one hand, virtual worlds are used for recreational and entertainment purposes; on the other hand, they can serve as a platform and venue for social interactions and educational or instructional goals, as exemplified by Second Life. In these virtual worlds, users are often represented through symbols and graphical images known as avatars, which are not only used for interaction with other users but also for engagement with virtual objects (such as virtual houses, virtual helmets, virtual clothing, etc.), which can be exchanged and transferred among users within the same virtual world. The Romano-Germanic legal system includes countries with civil law traditions. Accordingly, this codified law is characterized by a coherent, highly structured, and systematic framework. Moreover, this legal tradition, without reference to detailed descriptions, relies on general and abstract principles. Additionally, the creation of new property rights through judicial interpretation is not feasible, as the civil law system renders such possibilities highly restrictive and limited, although the degree of rigidity and strictness varies among countries.

References

Badenhorst, P. J., Pienaar, J. M., & Mostert, H. (2006). Silberberg & Schoeman's The Law of Property.

Bauer, F., Bauer, J. F., & Stürner, R. (1999). Sachenrecht (Vol. 33).

Blazer, C. (2006). The three Indicia of Virtual Property. Pierce LR, 5, 137-161.

Fairfield, J. A. T. (2005). Virtual Property. BUL Rev, 85, 1047-1102.

Harata, H. (2010). an interim report on savignys methodology and his founding of a modern historical jurisprudence.

Hart, H. (2011). The Concept of Law. Ney Publications.

Hodavand, M., & Mashhadi, A. (2020). Principles of Administrative Law in Light of the Rulings of the Administrative Court of Justice. Kharsandi Publishing.

Lastowka, F. G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The Laws of the Virtual Worlds. CLR, 92, 1-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481444

Mahmoudi, N. (2023). Introductory Course on Civil Law. Mizan Publishing.

Saket, M. H. (2020). Jurisprudence: An Introduction to the Science of Law. Sales Publishing.

Van der Walt, A. J. (2005). Constitutional Property Law.

Wacks, R. (2025). Philosophy of Law (Brief and to the Point). Jangal Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

Submitted

2025-06-12

Revised

2025-09-21

Accepted

2025-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shariat Kermani , A. ., Sabahi Garaghani, M., & Salari, Y. . (2025). Analysis of Virtual World Elements with Emphasis on Property Rights. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.196

Similar Articles

81-90 of 91

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.