The Future of Intellectual Property in AI-Generated Creativity: Authorship, Originality, and Protection

Authors

    Andrew De Smet Department of Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Emily Carter * Department of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom emily.carter@law.ox.ac.uk
    Li Wei Department of International Relations, Peking University, Beijing, China

Keywords:

AI-generated creativity, intellectual property, authorship, originality, copyright, generative AI, machine learning, derivative works, policy frameworks, digital governance

Abstract

The rise of generative artificial intelligence has transformed the nature of creative production, forcing a fundamental re-evaluation of the intellectual property frameworks that govern authorship, originality, and ownership. As large language models, image generators, and multimodal systems increasingly produce complex and aesthetically refined works, traditional copyright doctrines—grounded in human intentionality and expressive labor—struggle to accommodate outputs generated through autonomous or semi-autonomous computational processes. This narrative review synthesizes current legal, ethical, and policy debates to examine how AI-generated creativity challenges long-standing assumptions about what qualifies as a creative work and who may claim authorship or control. The article explores the conceptual divide between human–AI co-creation and fully automated generation, the shifting boundaries of human contribution, and the emerging complexities of originality in contexts where outputs may be statistically novel yet lack human expressive judgment. It analyzes the growing difficulty of evaluating derivative works, substantial similarity, and accidental replication within algorithmic generation, highlighting unresolved tensions in applying traditional infringement standards to non-human creative systems. The review also assesses national regulatory approaches, including developments in the United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Singapore, and China, alongside broader international harmonization challenges involving cross-border disputes and enforcement gaps. Finally, the article discusses future pathways for intellectual property protection, including proposals for AI-assisted authorship categories, hybrid rights frameworks, presumptive human ownership, and transparency obligations for generative systems. By synthesizing these threads, the review underscores the need for adaptable, ethically grounded, and technologically informed legal reforms capable of addressing the evolving dynamics of creativity in an AI-driven era.

References

An, X. (2023). Legal Rights Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Works From the Perspective of Copyright. The Frontiers of Society Science and Technology, 5(18). https://doi.org/10.25236/fsst.2023.051805

Atilla, S. (2023). Dealing With AI-generated Works: Lessons From the CDPA Section 9(3). Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 19(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad102

Birštonas, R. (2023). Risks to Employees’ Intellectual Property Rights Posed by Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the University of Latvia Law, 16, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.16.03

Bukhari, S. W. R., Hassan, S., & Aleem, Y. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Copyright Law: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Law & Social Studies, 5(4), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.05.04.647656

Bysaga, Y. M., Byelov, D. M., & Zaborovskyi, V. V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Copyright and Related Rights. Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law, 2(76), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.76.2.47

ÇEbİ, E., Reisoğlu, P., & Goktas, E. (2023). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Copyright Law. Isslp, 2(2), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.2.2.5

Deck, A. (2023). Perspective Chapter: The Creative Surrogate. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110855

Díaz-Noci, J. (2023). Merging or Plagiarizing? The Role of Originality and Derivative Works in AI-aimed News Production. Hipertext Net Revista Académica Sobre Documentación Digital Y Comunicación Interactiva(26), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2023.i26.11

Fernández, D. M. M. (2023). Prospective Research in the Field of Teaching Creative Skills to Artificial Intelligence. 2(3), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.59214/cultural/3.2023.34

Goderdzishvili, T. G. T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Creative Thinking, the Future of Idea Generation. Economics, 105(3-4), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.36962/ecs105/3-4/2023-63

Gross, E.-C. (2023). The Creative Paradox of AI: Enabler or Disruptor of Human Imagination? Series Vii - Social Sciences and Law, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2023.16.65.1.7

Hees, J. V., Grootswagers, T., Quek, G. L., & Varlet, M. (2023). Human Perception of Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kvsu3

Hutson, J., & Lang, M. (2023). Content Creation or Interpolation: AI Generative Digital Art in the Classroom. Metaverse, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.54517/m.v4i1.2158

Kulinich, O., & Kondyk, D. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Criteria of Originality in Copyright Law. University Scientific Notes, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.93-94.4

Liu, J., Niu, Y., Jia, Z., & Wang, R. (2023). Assessing the Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Media Production and Its Impact on the Creative Industry. Medaad, 2023, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.70470/medaad/2023/005

Militsyna, K. (2023). Human Creative Contribution to AI-Based Output – One Just Can(’t) Get Enough. GRUR International, 72(10), 939-949. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad075

Munshi, M. F., & Barai, S. (2022). IP Rights to AI-Generated Works: Barriers Presented by Existing Law and Reformations Needed. Canadian Journal of Business and Information Studies, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.34104/cjbis.022.037046

Pınarbaşı, F., Çakır, F. S., Gültekin, D. G., Yazıcı, M., & Adıgüzel, Z. (2023). Examination of the Effects of Value Creation, Intellectual Property And organizational Creativity On artificial Intelligence Focused Enterprises. Business Process Management Journal, 30(1), 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-07-2023-0551

Rinkerman, G. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Evolving Issues Under US Copyright and Patent Law. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 6(2), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2023.0002

Shaista Peerzada Saurabh, R. W. (2023). AI and Copyright. TJJPT, 44(3), 3431-3439. https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i3.2053

Shin, H. (2023). The Artistic Potential of Artificial Intelligence Considered Through Review of AlphaGo. Korean Soc Cult Converg, 45(8), 509-520. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2023.08.45.08.509

Vinchon, F., Gironnay, V., & Lubart, T. (2023). The Creative AI-Land: Exploring New Forms of Creativity. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3226749/v1

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

Submitted

2023-02-11

Revised

2023-03-11

Accepted

2023-03-25

How to Cite

De Smet, A., Carter, E., & Wei, L. (2023). The Future of Intellectual Property in AI-Generated Creativity: Authorship, Originality, and Protection. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 2(2), 49-60. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/307

Similar Articles

1-10 of 159

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.