Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Subject? Philosophical Foundations and Practical Consequences of Granting Legal Personality to Machines

Authors

    Camila Rodríguez Department of Law, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
    Jennifer Lee * Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA jennifer.lee@stanford.edu

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, legal personality, legal subjectivity, agency, responsibility, legal philosophy, algorithmic governance, comparative law

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into social, economic, and legal processes has fundamentally disrupted the traditional architecture of legal responsibility and subjectivity. Contemporary legal systems, grounded in a binary distinction between natural persons and juridical persons, increasingly struggle to regulate autonomous algorithmic systems whose decisions shape rights, obligations, and social outcomes. This article investigates whether artificial intelligence can be coherently conceptualized as a legal subject and examines the philosophical and institutional consequences of such recognition. Employing a descriptive narrative review methodology, the study synthesizes philosophical theories of personhood and agency, classical doctrines of legal personality, and emerging comparative legal approaches to AI regulation. The analysis demonstrates that legal personality has historically functioned as an adaptive construct shaped by evolving social realities rather than a fixed metaphysical category. While artificial intelligence does not satisfy traditional human-centered criteria of personhood such as consciousness and moral autonomy, it increasingly exhibits functional forms of agency, autonomy, and causal power that challenge the adequacy of existing legal classifications. The article further explores the systemic implications of AI legal subjectivity across civil law, criminal responsibility, governance, and public policy, highlighting both the potential benefits of enhanced accountability and risk management and the ethical dangers of diluting human dignity and redistributing responsibility. The findings suggest that the central challenge is not whether AI should become a legal person in an absolute sense, but how legal systems can construct a flexible framework of legal subjectivity capable of accommodating artificial agency while preserving the moral and political foundations of law. The study concludes that rethinking legal ontology is essential for maintaining coherence, legitimacy, and justice in the age of intelligent machines.

References

Afanasyeva, E., & Furman, D. (2023). Legal Issues of Copyright Objects Processing by AI Systems in the Process of Machine Learning. Baikal Research Journal, 14(4), 1643-1656. https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2023.14(4).1643-1656

Atabekov, A. R. (2023). Legal Analysis of the Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence, Through the Prism of "Animals", "Human" and Other Persons for the Stability of the Structure. Административное И Муниципальное Право(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0595.2023.2.39934

Eck, M. V., & Agbeko, F. (2023). Electronic Persons in Contracts. Obiter, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v44i4.17507

Gorgoshadze, M., & Katamadze, M. (2022). Professor Guram Natchkebia as a Criminal Law Philosophy Problems Researcher (According to the Works Published in “Philosophical Investigations” Collection). Law and World, 8(3), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.36475/8.3.8

Greene, T., & Shmueli, G. (2023). Persons and Personalization on Digital Platforms. 214-270. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9591-9.ch011

Hsu, J.-J. W. C. (2023). Systematic Discussion of Artificial Intelligence’s Personality in Criminal Law and the Punishability for Improper Omission by the Group Acting as Their Guarantor Position. Russian Law Journal, 11(6s). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i6s.934

Karchevskyi, M. V., & Radutniy, O. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Ukrainian Traditional Categories of Criminal Law. Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 1(19), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2023.19.281123

Korkh, O. M., & Antonova, V. (2023). Metaphysical and Anthropological Principles of the Self-Made-Man Idea in Western Philosophy of the 17th Century. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research(23), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283610

Kovacheva, D. (2022). The New Subjects of Law – Are Artificial Intelligence Systems Already Among Us? De Jure, 13(2), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.54664/brem6290

Koval, I., Romanova, A., Farouq Ahmad Faleh Al, A., Alshunnaq, M. F. N., & Smotrych, D. (2022). Philosophical and Legal Foundations of the Formation of the Legal Consciousness of an Indi-Vidual in the Conditions of Training a Lawyer. Wisdom, 22(2), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v22i2.695

Kurki, V. (2022). Can Nature Hold Rights? It's Not as Easy as You Think. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(3), 525-552. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102522000358

Kurki, V. (2023). Legal Personhood. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025614

Mishagin, P. A. (2022). Analytical Formulation of the Problem of Freedom in the Context of a Socio-Legal Argumentation. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences(4), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-v201

Miulescu, V. (2022). ROMANIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GENERAL THEORY OF LAW AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE XXth CENTURY. AnnalsARSciPhil, 10(1-2), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.56082/annalsarsciphil.2022.1-2.49

Poole, R. A. (2022). Pavel Novgorodtsev and the Concept of Legal Consciousness in Russian Philosophy of Law. Hpy, 27, 84-123. https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-84-123

Rassolov, I. M., & Chubukova, S. G. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Effective Governance: Legal Framework. Kutafin Law Review, 9(2), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0525.2022.2.20.309-328

Vistak, I. (2023). Methodological Aspects of the Research of the Sociological Concept of Law in the USA. Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law, 2(79), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.2.62

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

Submitted

2025-12-17

Revised

2023-09-11

Accepted

2023-09-24

How to Cite

Rodríguez, C., & Lee, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Subject? Philosophical Foundations and Practical Consequences of Granting Legal Personality to Machines. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 2(4), 48-60. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/336

Similar Articles

41-50 of 242

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.