The Role of Judicial Precedent in the Realization of Tax Justice

Authors

    Mohammad Reza Rajabi Department of Public Law, NT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Ali Akbar Gorji Azandriani * Department of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran a_gorji@sbu.ac.ir
    Morteza Nejabatkhah Department of Law, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran
    Farhang Faghih Larijani Department of Law, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran

Keywords:

Tax justice, judicial precedent, Administrative Justice Court, prolonged proceedings, adjudicatory authorities

Abstract

An efficient tax system, under the principle of the rule of law, is founded above all on the pillar of “justice.” Nevertheless, the realization of tax justice within the Iranian legal system, as a fundamental ideal, faces serious ambiguities and challenges in the process of concretely implementing legal provisions. This is because the genuine establishment of this concept depends not merely on the enactment of substantive laws, but also on the quality of judicial interpretation and supervision over the conduct of administrative authorities. The importance of this issue becomes even more pronounced when the lack of conformity between “abstract justice” and “executive realities” casts doubt on the efficiency of the tax system. From this perspective, the central issue of the present study is to explain the role of “judicial precedent” in resolving this tension and establishing a connection between the text of the law and practical justice. This issue is reflected in the following main question: What role does Iranian judicial precedent play in influencing tax justice, including horizontal justice (equality of taxpayers under similar conditions) and vertical justice (the proportionality of taxation to actual ability to pay)? The findings of this descriptive-analytical study indicate that “judicial precedent” — particularly the decisions of the General Board of the Administrative Justice Court — possesses significant potential for simultaneously strengthening horizontal justice (equality of taxpayers under similar conditions) and vertical justice (the proportionality of taxation to actual ability to pay) through safeguarding the principles of fair adjudication. However, the quality of this influence has been affected by limitations such as prolonged judicial proceedings, ambiguities arising from the digital economy, and legal constraints. This situation makes it inevitable to reconsider the position of this institution as a complementary pillar to the legislature in order to move toward a fair tax system and enhance the efficiency of the tax system in confronting contemporary developments.

References

Ataollahi, H., Amini Sabeq, Z., Sadeh, E., & Kalantari Khalilabad, H. (2023). Presenting a Tax Justice Policymaking Model Aligned with the Statement on the Second Step of the Islamic Revolution. Tax Research Journal, 57(105), 103-121.

Babazadeh, V., Hedavand, M., Foroumand, L., & Shams, E. (2023). The Role of Supervision by the Administrative Court of Justice over the Discretionary Authority of the Iranian National Tax Administration. Economic Jurisprudence Studies, 5(3), 192-214.

Ebrahimian Jaloudar, S. Y., Ahmadi, M., & Iman-Khan, N. (2018). The Effect of Tax Justice and Tax Culture on Tax Compliance Considering the Role of Taxpayers' Attitudes in the Administrative System of Iran. Iranian journal of management sciences(49), 43-62.

Ghasemi Bonabari, H. R., Goudarzi, A., Mousavi, Z., & Mohammadrezaei Ardakani, M. (2024). Justice-Oriented Indicators in the Tax System Based on Direct Tax and Value Added Tax Laws. Tax Quarterly, 32(62), 186-199.

Goudarzi, A., Mousavi, Z., & Mohammadrezaei Ardakani, M. (2024). Justice-Oriented Indicators in the Tax System Based on Direct Tax and Value Added Tax Laws. Tax Research Journal(110), 76-93.

Habibi, S. N., Mashhadi, A., & Dabirnia, A. (2023). An Examination of Tax on Partition Deeds in the Judgments of the Administrative Court of Justice. Iranian Journal of Political Sociology, 25, 114-126.

Habibnejad, S. A. (2023). Public Finance Law. Dadgostar.

Oecd. (2025). Tax Administration 2025: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. OECD Publishing.

Rafiei, M. R. (2021). Challenges of the Institution of Uniform Judicial Precedent Decisions. Judiciary Legal Journal, 85(114), 224-243.

Sabouri, M., Samadi, S., & Izadinia, N. (2020). The Effect of Reviving Article 169 Bis of the Direct Taxes Act on Tax Disputes and Tax Avoidance. Journal of Accounting Knowledge(43), 31-48.

Seraji, S. (2021). Tax Law in Judicial Practice. Ashkan Publications.

Shahniaei, A. (2022). Principles of Legal Interpretation in Tax Law with Reference to Tax and Judicial Decisions. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 503-526.

Tax Justice, N. (2025). State of Tax Justice 2025.

Zahedi, A. (2015). Tax Law in Judicial Practice. Javidaneh.

Zendedel Boroun, M. R. (2016). Tax Justice in the Value Added Tax System. Pazhuhesh Mellal, 1(9), 1-22.

Downloads

Published

2027-03-01

Submitted

2026-01-28

Revised

2026-05-20

Accepted

2026-05-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rajabi , M. R., Gorji Azandriani, A. A., Nejabatkhah , M., & Faghih Larijani , F. (2027). The Role of Judicial Precedent in the Realization of Tax Justice. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-14. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/402

Similar Articles

21-30 of 160

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.