Smart Contracts and Their Status in the Validity of Contracts from the Perspective of Iranian Law

Authors

    Amir Mirzavand * Master of Private Law, Borujerd Branch, University of Science and Research, Borujerd, Iran Mirzavandamir@gmail.com

Keywords:

Smart contracts; contract validity; Iranian law; electronic contracts; blockchain; contractual intention; automated performance

Abstract

The rapid expansion of blockchain-based transactions and automated digital systems has created new questions for contract law, particularly regarding the validity of agreements formed, recorded, or executed through computer code. This article examines the legal status of smart contracts from the perspective of Iranian law, with specific attention to the general requirements of contractual validity. The study adopts a doctrinal and analytical approach and argues that smart contracts should not be considered legally valid merely because they are technically executable, nor should they be rejected simply because they are coded or automated. Rather, their validity must be assessed according to the established principles of Iranian contract law, including intention and consent, legal capacity, definiteness of subject matter, and lawfulness of purpose. The article explains that code may function as a means of expressing contractual intention, recording agreement, or performing obligations, but it cannot replace the substantive legal foundations of a valid contract. Particular attention is given to problems of offer and acceptance, attribution of automated acts, cryptographic authorization, defects of consent, coding errors, oracle failure, pseudonymity, consumer protection, and the conflict between coded terms and natural-language agreements. The article further argues that the most appropriate model for Iranian law is a hybrid model in which a legally understandable written agreement defines the parties’ rights and obligations, while the smart contract automates selected aspects of performance. This approach allows Iranian law to recognize the practical advantages of smart contracts, including efficiency, certainty, and evidentiary reliability, while preserving judicial authority to examine validity, interpret intention, correct defective transactions, and provide remedies. The article concludes that smart contracts can have a valid place in Iranian contract law when they satisfy ordinary contractual requirements and when their electronic operation can be reliably attributed to legally responsible parties.

References

Allen, T., & Widdison, R. (1996). Can Computers Make Contracts? Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 9(1), 25-52.

Clack, C. D., Bakshi, V. A., & Braine, L. (2016). Smart Contract Templates: Foundations, Design Landscape and Research Directions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00771

De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674976429

Fairfield, J. A. T. (2014). Smart Contracts, Bitcoin Bots, and Consumer Protection. Washington and Lee Law Review Online, 71(2), 35-50. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol71/iss2/3/

Giancaspro, M. (2017). Is a 'Smart Contract' Really a Smart Idea? Insights from a Legal Perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(6), 825-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.007

Grimmelmann, J. (2019). All Smart Contracts Are Ambiguous. Journal of Law & Innovation, 2(1), 1-22. https://repository.law.upenn.edu/jli/vol2/iss1/1/

Mik, E. (2017). Smart Contracts: Terminology, Technical Limitations and Real World Complexity. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(2), 269-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1378468

Nejatzadegan, S., & Soltani, M. (2023). Analysis of General Conditions of Smart Contracts Validity from Iranian and American Legal Perspective. Legal Research Quarterly, 25(Special Issue of Law & Technology), 303-335. https://doi.org/10.52547/jlr.2023.226492.2144

O'Shields, R. (2017). Smart Contracts: Legal Agreements for the Blockchain. North Carolina Banking Institute, 21, 177-194. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol21/iss1/11/

Raskin, M. (2017). The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 1(2), 305-341. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Raskin-1-GEO.-L.-TECH.-REV.-305-.pdf

Savelyev, A. (2017). Contract Law 2.0: 'Smart' Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law. Information & Communications Technology Law, 26(2), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1301036

Sklaroff, J. M. (2017). Smart Contracts and the Cost of Inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(1), 263-303. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/prize_papers/9/

Szabo, N. (1996). Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets. Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought(16). https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.html

Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548

Werbach, K., & Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts Ex Machina. Duke Law Journal, 67(2), 313-382. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol67/iss2/2/

Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664

Downloads

Published

2024-03-10

Submitted

2026-01-01

Revised

2026-05-17

Accepted

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Mirzavand, A. (2024). Smart Contracts and Their Status in the Validity of Contracts from the Perspective of Iranian Law. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 3(1), 148-160. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/434

Similar Articles

51-60 of 299

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.