Material Elements of the Crime of Assault on the State’s Airspace: A Comparative Study
Keywords:
Crime of Assault, Contingency Model Design, Airspace Violation, Material Elements of the CrimeAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive legal analysis of the crime of assault on the state’s airspace by examining the material element as articulated in criminal law theory and national legislation. Building on classical definitions of actus reus, the study explores how external physical conduct—such as unauthorized entry, deviation from air routes, low-altitude violations, misuse of transit and innocent passage, aircraft hijacking, and drone or missile incursions—constitutes the observable basis for criminal liability in the aerial domain. The research emphasizes that airspace violations generate both material results, including physical damage and safety hazards, and legal results, such as infringements on sovereignty, disruption of national security, and intelligence exposure. The analysis also details the evidentiary challenges in establishing causation, particularly in cases involving unmanned aerial vehicles, cyber interference, and ballistic missiles, where radar tracking, satellite imagery, and aviation logs play critical roles. A comparative study of Iraqi, Egyptian, and Emirati legislation reveals distinct approaches to defining and criminalizing airspace violations. Iraq provides a clear conceptual definition of the material element but lacks technological updates addressing drones and missiles. Egypt relies on sector-based aviation regulation without a unified doctrinal structure, creating fragmentation and interpretive challenges. The United Arab Emirates offers the most advanced framework, integrating international conventions, detailed domestic provisions, and modern technological controls governing UAVs and cyber threats. The findings demonstrate that modern airspace regulation requires cohesive legislative reform, strong alignment with international standards, and explicit recognition of emerging forms of aerial misconduct. The study concludes by proposing legislative pathways for strengthening national airspace protection in an era of rapidly evolving aerial technologies.
References
Ajmal, A. (2023). Insanity, Insanity Defense, and the Elements of Crime: A Review. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(III). https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-iii)46
Al-Tkhayneh, K. M. (2024). The Criminal Confrontation for Crimes of Discrimination and Hate Speech: A Comparative Study. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(2), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-7.2-a000210
Ali, S., & Saberi, R. (2020). The Relativistic Theory of Coincidence Between Mens Rea and Actus Reus in Islamic and English Law. East African Scholars Journal of Education Humanities and Literature, 3(10), 492-508. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjehl.2020.v03i10.001
Alkatbi, S. O., & Alkrisheh, M. A. (2024). Legislative Policy in the Face of Discrimination and Hate Crimes in UAE Law. Aau Journal of Business and Law, 8(1), 64-89. https://doi.org/10.51958/aaujbl2024v8i1p4
Barus, Y. J. (2021). Jurisdiction of a Country’s Air Territorry in International Law Perspective. Journal of Law Science, 3(3), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v3i3.1673
Cauia, A., & Bria, F. (2021). Mechanisms and Legal Instruments to Ensure Air Route Safety. The Journal of the National Institute of Justice(4(59)). https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2021.4(59).07
Drăniceru, M. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of “Mens Rea” of the Assault on Civil Servants. Across, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35219/across.2022.5.1.09
Ibrahim, E., Sharif, H., & Aboelazm, K. S. (2025). Legal Confrontation of the Cyber Blackmail: A Comparative Study. JLSDGR, 5(2), e04039. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe04039
Jonas, L. A. (2021). Actus Reus and Mens Rea in International Criminal Law. 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004470934_004
Kamali, M. H. (2019). Shariah Punishments in Libya, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. 329-C333.P319. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190910648.003.0033
Kokha, A. Y. H. (2021). The Extent to Amount ISIL Acts Against Iraqi Minorities to Genocide. Revue Québécoise De Droit International, 32(2), 59-105. https://doi.org/10.7202/1075170ar
Mungan, M. C. (2022). Law, Criminal. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosl019.pub2
Munoz-Cordero, F. (2025). Tech-Enabled Sovereignty: Leveraging Innovation and Bilateral Defense Cooperation for Airspace Security in Colombia. Revista Científica Y Académica, 5(2), 2575-2591. https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a..v5i2.1299
Nahi, M. (2025). Losing Citizenship by Deprivation in the Framework of Private International Law: A Comparative Study. JLSDGR, 5(6), e06906. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n06.pe06906
Omer Abd Alnafea Khaleel, A.-B. (2023). Crimes Related to Voter Registration and Inclusion in Electoral Lists: a Comparative Legal Study (Syria, Egypt and Iraq). Теория И Практика Общественного Развития(12), 378-383. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2023.12.50
Sari, H. P. (2024). Indonesian Airspace Sovereignty; Perspective of Law No. 1 of 2009 on Aviation and the Flight Information Region (Fir) Agreement Between Indonesia and Singapore 2022. Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), 1702-1710. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5052
Vodolaskova, K., & Головко, С. Г. (2023). Historical Aspects and Overview of Legal Understanding of Airspace Sovereignty Concept. Scientific Works of National Aviation University Series Law Journal Air and Space Law, 1(66), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.66.17411
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ameer Ali Abed Murshedi, Mahmood Malmir, Ali Adil Ismail Kashef Al-Ghetaa, Mahmood Ashrafy (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.