The Evolution of the Principle of Intergenerational Justice in Light of the Requirements of International Environmental Law from 1972 to 2024
Keywords:
intergenerational justice, international environmental law, legal obligations, sustainable development, conventions and agreements from 1972 to 2024Abstract
Intergenerational justice, as a concept concerned with the rights and interests of future generations, emphasizes the necessity of responsible use of natural resources and environmental protection. This concept entered international environmental law through the Stockholm Conference of 1972 and, by 2024, had been developed in major instruments such as the Rio Declaration of 1992, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement, and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Using a descriptive-analytical research method, this study examines how these instruments, through the establishment of state obligations, legal frameworks, and mechanisms of international cooperation, provide the basis for future generations’ access to minimum standards of living and sustainable natural resources. The findings indicate that the principle of intergenerational justice requires the obligations of international environmental law to regulate development and the exploitation of natural resources in such a way that the rights of future generations are protected and a balance of interests between generations is maintained. Through the creation of state obligations and mechanisms of international cooperation, these instruments have played a role in ensuring minimum environmental standards for future generations. The main contribution of this study is that, by providing a systematic analysis of the historical and legal trajectory of the requirements arising from international environmental instruments between 1972 and 2024, it enables a more precise evaluation of the extent to which these requirements have affected intergenerational justice and offers a theoretical foundation for developing and strengthening the status of this principle in international environmental law. However, practical and empirical evidence shows that, given the soft-law nature of international environmental law, it has not been able to adequately safeguard and protect the principle of intergenerational justice. Moreover, the adoption of a “Comprehensive Convention on Intergenerational Justice” and the international criminalization of “ecocide” in the Statute of the International Criminal Court, or the establishment of a specialized environmental court, are proposed as measures to strengthen the enforceability of this principle.
References
Adelman, S. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals, Anthropocentrism and Neoliberalism. In S. Adelman & J. Gonzalez (Eds.), International Environmental Law and the Global South (pp. 37-55). Cambridge University Press.
Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality: A Treatise on Social Justice (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/52033
Brown Weiss, E. (2013). In Fairness to Future Generations: The Role of Justice in International Law. Oxford University Press.
De Lucia, V. (2023). Toward an Ecological Philosophy of International Law: From Anthropocentrism to Ecocentrism. Edward Elgar Publishing.
De Shalit, A. (1995). Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Why-Posterity-Matters-Environmental-Policies-and-Future-Generations/De-Shalit/p/book/9780203980644
Dehm, J. (2020). Reconsidering International Environmental Law: Development, Human Rights and the Politics of Expertise. In J. Dehm & U. Natarajan (Eds.), Locating Nature: Making and Unmaking International Law (pp. 95-115). Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1984). Rights as Trumps. In J. Waldron (Ed.), Theories of Rights (pp. 153-167). Oxford University Press.
Esfandiari, C., & Mirabbasi, S. B. (2015). Examining the Dimensions of the Right to Food and Food Security in International Instruments. Medical Law Quarterly(35).
Farshasaeidi, P., & Issazadeh, M. (2015). International Responsibility of States in Preventing and Compensating Damage Caused by Transboundary Pollution. International Conference on New Research in Agricultural Sciences and the Environment,
Grear, A. (2017). Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Rise of Posthuman International Law. Humanity, 8(1), 49-75.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Fifth Assessment Report.
Jones, K. (2021). Gender, Race and Power in International Environmental Law. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 12(1), 65-88.
Knight, R. (1977). The Evolution of International Environmental Law and Conservation Treaties. Environmental Law Review, 47-48.
Mackie, J. L. (1984). Can There Be a Right-Based Moral Theory? In J. Waldron (Ed.), Theories of Rights (pp. 168-181). Oxford University Press.
Natarajan, U., & Dehm, J. (2022). Where Is the Environment? Locating Nature in International Law. TWAIL Review, 1(1), 1-23.
Pourkhaghan Shahrezaei, Z. (2017). International Responsibility for Damage Caused by Climate Change. Comparative Law(11).
Ramezani Qavam-Abadi, M. H., & Shafiqfar, H. (2016). Sustainable Development and the Right to a Healthy Environment: The Prospect of Future Generations. Global Politics Quarterly, 5(1).
Shaw, M. N. (2013). International Environmental Law (A. Mashhadi & H. Khosroshahi, Trans.). Khorsandi Publications.
United Nations. (1972). Office International of Public Health: Environmental Health and the Protection of Human and Animal Species.
United Nations General Assembly. (2013). Promotion of Intergenerational Solidarity for the Achievement of Sustainable Development: Report of the Secretary-General.
United Nations General Assembly. (2021). Report of the Secretary-General: Promoting Intergenerational Solidarity for the Achievement of Sustainable Development.
United Nations General Assembly. (2022). Promotion of Solidarity between Generations for the Achievement of Sustainable Development.
Urzola Gutierrez, C. (2023). Intergenerational Justice, Gender and Global Environmental Governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 23(1), 1-18.
Vafadar, A. (2007). Obligations and Responsibility of States in Respecting the Environment. Journal of environmental science and technology.
Virally, M. (1968). The Concept of International Law: Its Transformation through Time. Editions A. Pedone.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Davood Keramati (Author); Armin Amini; Fateme Binazade (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.