The Evolution of Cyber Tort Liability: Conceptual Challenges in Algorithm-Induced Harm

Authors

    Daniel Tremblay Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Jennifer Lee * Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA jennifer.lee@stanford.edu
    Amelia Lawson Department of Law, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Keywords:

Cyber tort liability, algorithm-induced harm, artificial intelligence, legal responsibility, causation, duty of care, autonomous systems, algorithmic governance, digital regulation, emerging technologies

Abstract

The rapid advancement of algorithmic and autonomous decision-making systems has fundamentally reshaped the nature, sources, and pathways of harm in the digital age, challenging the foundational assumptions of traditional tort law. As machine learning, predictive analytics, and neural networks increasingly influence medical, commercial, administrative, and social environments, legal systems struggle to reconcile long-standing doctrines with emerging forms of injury that arise from opaque, adaptive, and probabilistic computational processes. This narrative review adopts a descriptive–analytic approach to examine the historical evolution of cyber tort liability, beginning with early internet harms such as defamation, intrusion, software negligence, and cybersecurity breaches, and moving through transitional phases marked by platform liability debates and the growing influence of algorithmic content curation. The review then analyzes the conceptual and doctrinal tensions exposed by algorithm-induced harms, including challenges of causation, foreseeability, duty of care, standard of reasonableness, attribution, vicarious liability, and the classification of algorithms as products, services, or sui generis entities. It further surveys emerging regulatory responses across jurisdictions, including the European Union’s risk-based AI governance approach, the fragmented U.S. reliance on traditional tort principles and platform immunity, the nuanced common-law adaptations in the UK, Canada, and Australia, and Asia’s increasingly administrative models of algorithmic oversight. International soft-law instruments are also examined for their role in harmonizing global approaches. The review concludes that algorithmic systems generate structural contradictions within tort doctrine, revealing the need for conceptual reframing and new liability models that can accommodate distributed agency, systemic harms, and technological opacity. These insights offer a foundation for future legal scholarship and policy development aimed at ensuring accountability in an era defined by autonomous digital systems.

References

Alyami, A. S., Majrashi, N. A., & Shubayr, N. A. (2021). Radiologists’ and Radiographers’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging in Saudi Arabia (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.35765

Bączyk-Rozwadowska, K. (2022). Civil Liability for Damages Caused in Connection With the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. PPM, 3(3-4), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.70537/z7xnk378

Bashayreh, M. H., Tabbara, A., & Sibai, F. N. (2023). The Need for a Legal Standard of Care in the AI Environment. Sriwijaya Law Review, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol7.iss1.1507.pp73-86

Brogan, J. (2021). The Next Era of Biomedical Research. Voices in Bioethics, 7. https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v7i.8854

Cestonaro, C., Delicati, A., Marcante, B., Caenazzo, L., & Tozzo, P. (2023). Defining Medical Liability When Artificial Intelligence Is Applied on Diagnostic Algorithms: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Medicine, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1305756

Chagal-Feferkorn, K. (2021). How Can I Tell if My Algorithm Was Reasonable? Michigan Technology Law Review(27.2), 213. https://doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.27.2.how

Dyson, M. R. (2022). Combatting AI’s Protectionism &Amp; Totalitarian-Coded Hypnosis: The Case for AI Reparations &Amp; Antitrust Remedies in the Ecology of Collective Self-Determination. Smu Law Review, 75(3), 625. https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.75.3.7

Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Jingwa, K. A., Okoye, O. K., Okah, M. J., Ladele, J. A., Farah, A. H., & Alimi, H. A. (2023). Ethical Implications of AI and Robotics in Healthcare: A Review. Medicine, 102(50), e36671. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036671

Gallese, C. (2022). Suggestions for a Revision of the European Smart Robot Liability Regime. Icair, 4(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.851

Ganapathy, K. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Regulatory and Legal Concerns. Telehealth and Medicine Today. https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v6.252

Gayvoronskaya, Y., & Galchun, E. A. (2021). The Harm Caused by Artificial Intelligence: Aspects of Responsibility and Legal Personality. Advances in Law Studies, 9(4), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2021-9-4-76-80

Huberman, P. (2020). Tort Law, Corrective Justice and the Problem of Autonomous-Machine-Caused Harm. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 34(1), 105-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.3

Kharitonova, Y. S., Savina, V., & Pagnini, F. (2022). Civil Liability in the Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Systems: Basic Approaches. Вестник Пермского Университета Юридические Науки(4(58)), 683-708. https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-683-708

McDonald, L. (2023). AI Systems and Liability: An Assessment of the Applicability of Strict Liability &Amp; A Case for Limited Legal Personhood for AI. St Andrews Law Journal, 3(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.15664/stalj.v3i1.2645

Moodley, K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Augmented Intelligence? How Big Data and AI Are Transforming Healthcare: Challenges and Opportunities. South African Medical Journal, 114(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2024.v114i1.1631

Mosaddeque, A., Rowshon, M., Ahmed, T., Twaha, U., & Babu, B. N. (2022). The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Fortifying Cybersecurity Systems in the US Healthcare Industry. Ijss, 1(2), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v1i2.101

O’Sullivan, S., Nevejans, N., Allen, C., Blyth, A., Léonard, S., Pagallo, U., Holzinger, K., Holzinger, A., Sajid, M. I., & Ashrafian, H. (2019). Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Frameworks for Development of Standards in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Robotic Surgery. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1968

Sqalli, M. T., Aslonov, B., Gafurov, M., & Nurmatov, S. (2023). Humanizing AI in Medical Training: Ethical Framework for Responsible Design. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1189914

Tretyakova, E. P. (2021). Using Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Allocating Liability and Risks. Digital Law Journal, 2(4), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-4-51-60

Zelinski, C. (2023). Chatbots, Generative Ai, and Scholarly Manuscripts Wame Recommendations on Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Scholarly Publications. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute, 37(3), 221-224. https://doi.org/10.54079/jpmi.37.3.3284

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

Submitted

2025-07-12

Revised

2025-12-01

Accepted

2025-12-07

How to Cite

Tremblay, D., Lee, J., & Lawson, A. (2023). The Evolution of Cyber Tort Liability: Conceptual Challenges in Algorithm-Induced Harm. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 2(3), 49-63. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/318

Similar Articles

1-10 of 222

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.